Greater Greater Washington

Development


Brookland: save the environment somewhere else

As Brookland debates whether to build some higher-density housing next to its Metro station or preserve their "trash-strewn chain-linked blight," as one resident put it, the "I'm an environmentalist but..." arguments are back.


Photo by wiredwitch on Flickr.

In a post entitled "Brookland bears the burden of saving Planet Earth! Act now or destroy civilization as we know it!" one resident wrote,

Is this really the ONLY place in DC that you can imagine would be suitable for increasing residential density? Will the planet really dry up and whither away if Brookland is allowed to grow in a way that doesn't involve mass destruction of its core area? I am a supporter of increased density and development, but this plan goes WAY further than what that would require.
What if every neighborhood said the same thing and pushed for development to go somewhere else? From another:
How does green space increase auto trips? If the area north of metro is being developed, and all the other places, like AFRH, RI AVE, CUA, PAULISTS, etc. why not leave the last decent open area around metro, it is always needed for buses. ... Let all these other planned developments build up and be complete and be occupied and have no vacancy.
Green space next to the Metro means we've missed an opportunity to decrease auto trips. AFRH isn't next to a Metro station, and the high cost of nice apartments and houses in the cityincluding Brooklandprove that there's plenty of demand for living here. Besides, this isn't a sacrifice everyone has to make. Many residents are excited about replacing the dead zone around their Metro station with something lively.
David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

In some ways I can understand they could do devlopments in more areas that are close to downtown and that already have highrises there is not one highrise in brookland and then just putting one in the middle of it would make residents happy.

For example the area between New Hampshire Ave, U street & New Jersey Ave and north of N street has very little highrises and buildings over 4 stores when looking at its distance to downtown that area is where all the development should be occuring instead of mostly residental areas outside of the downtown area of the city

They should start downtown and then spread out not the other way picking areas outside of downtown by miles and expect all this to work there without problems.

Either way DC will be like a small version of the city of new york within 10 years with the same problems they have.

by kk on May 20, 2008 1:14 pm • linkreport

You mean like the lowest crime rate in the nation, kk? We can only hope.

There are tons of 'high' rises going in the area you mentioned. But the Brookland sites proximity to the metro makes it "as close" to Union station as 15th and N. The whole city is being infilled, the most desirable locations are near metro stations and are filling in fastest. Have you been to Columbia Heights? That's outside the area you mentioned, but it developed before 7th and Q because of its metro access.

btw my code words were "town wanted" EXACTLY

by Alex on May 20, 2008 6:22 pm • linkreport

Alex,

I see that most is occuring near metros, if you look at cities other than dc subways arent always the most important concern most of the time they are not even a consideration.

I have lived in major cities all over the world and distance to transit is not really a major concern, the major concern is usually, distance to work, shopping, grocery stores, schools etc. not distance to a train station.

In most cities major cities outside of the US people will walk, bike, take buses for medium to sometimes even long distances to things such as train, subway, monorail and tram stations because everything is usually in there neighborhood and therefore they don't usually need to leave the area that often to get anything.

by kk on May 20, 2008 11:10 pm • linkreport

This seems like one of those, "Its good as long as its not in my neighborhood."

by Roy on May 28, 2008 1:23 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or