Government
Tommy Wells gets transportation chair, WMATA Board
Tommy Wells was awarded oversight over the Committee on Public Works and Transportation in the DC Council today, and also chosen as the DC voting member on the WMATA Board of Directors.
This represents an innovative move by Kwame Brown to demonstrate that he wants progressive action as opposed to the status quo in the coming year. Tommy Wells is the Councilmember most interested in bringing modern transportation practices to DC, including complete streets that balance the needs of drivers, walkers, bikers and transit riders.
While Wells' policies are sometimes seen as very pioneering, Dr. Gridlock's comments about Gabe Klein apply equally to Wells: "There's nothing radical in the bike lanes program, or the streetcar program or the street-parking program, or the pedestrian safety program. What looked to us here like cutting-edge programs would seem like catch-up to people in other big cities."
With the DDOT unified fund dismantled, the Council will play a larger role in reviewing and setting priorities for DDOT. That means the transportation committee will have a strong hand in either pushing DDOT to continue its innovative progress or to stall it, and Wells is the best one to keep things moving.
Councilmembers Jim Graham, Mary Cheh, and Harry Thomas, Jr. will be the other members of the committee. The committee's jurisdiction will not change, except Graham will keep his oversight over alcoholic beverage licensing along with taking over Human Services from Wells.
As chair, Jim Graham did a lot of good work while also being the focus of much controversy. Created a fund for local money to go to pedestrian and bicycle improvements, and moved the Sidewalk Assurance Act through the Council. He passed performance parking legislation, and has been forceful about real enforcement of parking laws. And he personally answers nearly every constituent email that he receives.
Graham also fought hard for DC's interests on a WMATA Board where DC often feels at a disadvantage compared to the suburban interests. (Disclosure: He also appointed me to the Riders' Advisory Council.) His transportation policy staffer, Jonathon Kass, is one of the best in the Council and very progressive. I hope Wells hires Kass without delay for the new committee.
On the other hand, some of Graham's tougher negotiating tactics like using the jurisdictional veto to block even holding a public hearing on certain fare proposals garnered significant criticism from myself and others. He was often seen as favoring transit in Ward 1 over elsewhere in the city, though as the densest ward and one with a low rate of car ownership, the transit brought many benefits.
The announcement did not specify whether Michael Brown will continue as the alternate on the WMATA Board, or whether a different person will take that over. Michael Brown had the worst attendance of all Board members from January to August of this year, but he could be a fine member if he were interested in starting to participate actively.
There could be some benefit for human services advocates to have Jim Graham take over: Graham is very good at fighting for the budget for areas he oversees, and facing deep cuts, human services could use his skill in that area.
On a more disappointing note, Harry Thomas, Jr., DC's biggest cheerleader for unwalkable big box development, will take over the Committee on Economic Development. Councilmembers Yvette Alexander, Marion Barry, and Jack Evans will round out the committee, which doesn't bode well to create pressure for better or more walkable development.
The full list of committee chairs:
- Aging and Community Affairs: Marion Barry (previously Yvette Alexander)
- Economic Development: Harry Thomas, Jr. (previously Kwame Brown)
- Finance and Revenue: Jack Evans
- Government Operations and the Environment: Mary Cheh
- Health: David Catania
- Housing and Workforce Development: Michael Brown
- Human Services: Jim Graham (previously Tommy Wells)
- Libraries, Parks and Recreation: Muriel Bowser (previously Harry Thomas, Jr.)
- Public Safety and the Judiciary: Phil Mendelson
- Public Services and Consumer Affairs: Yvette Alexander (previously Muriel Bowser)
- Public Works and Transportation: Tommy Wells (previously Jim Graham)
Comments
- Metro bag searches aren't always optional
- Young kids try to assault me while biking
- Redeveloping McMillan is the only way to save it
- Vienna Metro town center won't have a town center
- Endless zoning update delay hurts homeowners
- DDOT agrees to repave 15th Street cycle track
- Residents organize for positive change in Bluemont







Regarding the Dr. Gridlock quote, how many US cities would consider what DC is doing regarding bike lanes, streetcars, street parking, or the pedestrian safety, playing catch up? Three?
by Steven Yates on Dec 22, 2010 4:05 pm • link • report
by Michael Perkins on Dec 22, 2010 4:12 pm • link • report
LA surprises me from that list (I've never thought that they were that progressive when it came to transportation). But I don't think that many more cities can be added to that list.
by Steven Yates on Dec 22, 2010 4:15 pm • link • report
by andrew on Dec 22, 2010 4:18 pm • link • report
Fair enough, but I guess my interpretation would be someone visiting from LA and seeing what DC is doing and thinking that "Wow, DC is just now doing this? How quaint." From that perspective, I don't think I'd put LA on the list.
by Steven Yates on Dec 22, 2010 4:25 pm • link • report
That's a pretty strong condemnation. Could you provide a couple examples?
by Randall M. on Dec 22, 2010 4:28 pm • link • report
by John on Dec 22, 2010 4:33 pm • link • report
by Rj on Dec 22, 2010 5:14 pm • link • report
by John on Dec 22, 2010 5:21 pm • link • report
by Fritz on Dec 22, 2010 6:09 pm • link • report
by cminus on Dec 22, 2010 8:37 pm • link • report
On Streetcars, Portland, Seattle, Tacoma, Tampa...
The point isn't that DC does better than lots of places, of course it does, it's just that DC shouldn't be satisfied to do a better job than say Des Moines, Iowa.
This came up in my blog once. Someone wrote something comparable to Steven Yates' point. I replied that it's our job as residents-advocates to advocate for the best DC. It also made me realize that on this dimension, relativity rules. E.g., I would read complaints on NYC blogs about things in NYC, and thing "it's so much better there than it is here" while failing to recognize that within your community "relativity" is actually "absolute" that you are only evaluating your own place and what you want it to be, based on what it is.
Another interesting question is that DC and Seattle engaged in streetcar planning starting at roughly the same time, 2003. Seattle's first streetcar line opened up in late 2007...
by Richard Layman on Dec 23, 2010 8:07 am • link • report
You've hit the nail on the head. I can't tell you how many times I've heard people chuckle and say 'they're not really comparing us to Portland Ore of all places, are they? Don't they understand that Washington has a far higher bar to reach? That, for example, wires hanging in the streets in downtown Portland may be okay, but will never acceptable for Washington?'
by Lance on Dec 23, 2010 8:16 am • link • report
by Paul S on Dec 23, 2010 8:30 am • link • report
by Fritz on Dec 23, 2010 8:53 am • link • report
by David Alpert on Dec 23, 2010 9:09 am • link • report
But while it's unusual, it's hardly unheard-of either, and it might be nice if one of the exceptions happened in this case. Wells already has a capable transportation and smart growth advisor in Anne Phelps, but if I were staffing that committee I'd consider having two people just to tackle DDOT and WMATA, depending on my budget.
by cminus on Dec 23, 2010 10:15 am • link • report
by David Alpert on Dec 23, 2010 10:31 am • link • report
@cminus: I'm trying to think of any other former Graham staffer who left to work for another CM, and I'm drawing a blank. Graham's not too keen on that sort of thing and he's known for holding very long grudges.
Also, the committee budget is, I believe $350k per committee. I don't know if Wells would be able to hire any additional staff within that limit (assuming all his Human Services committee people come over with him to PW&T).
Appleseed had done a report years ago about how to make the Council better, and one of its' biggest beefs was with how the committees are staffed and how they flip around so much, thereby eliminating any institutional knowledge and consistency. Appleseed recommended permanent professional staff that couldn't be used as extensions of the committee chair's personal office. The Council promptly ignored that recommendation.
The best Council committees are those that haven't switched staff in quite some time, mainly Evans and Catania. Unfortunately, they're the exception to the general rule.
by Fritz on Dec 23, 2010 1:01 pm • link • report
one of its' biggest beefs was with how the committees are staffed and how they flip around so much, thereby eliminating any institutional knowledge and consistency
QFT.
by cminus on Dec 23, 2010 1:30 pm • link • report
Add a Comment