Greater Greater Washington

Links


Breakfast links: Prince George's moving forward, mostly


Photo by jimmywayne on Flickr.
PG Metro board member yanked: Prince George's County Executive Rushern Baker has pulled alternate Marcel Solomon from the WMATA Board, citing his second-lowest attendance rate over the last 18 months. (Examiner) ... Meanwhile, Tommy Wells said he'll be appointed to DC's voting seat, but Kwame Brown says nothing is official yet. (Post)

Leslie Johnson won't control development: The Prince George's County Council has stripped Leslie Johnson of power to influence development in her district. Johnson was arrested along with her husband, the former County Executive, on corruption-related charges. Even better would be to end altogether the practice of deferring to each member on projects in their district, which detracts from countywide planning. (Post)

Teen killed in hit and run: A 14-year-old girl was struck twice while crossing Marlboro Pike in Capitol Heights, and later died. The first driver stopped, while the second fled the scene. Prince George's County police are looking for the other driver. (TBD)

Gray education picks are strong reformers: Vince Gray announced two top education officials: De'Shawn Wright, an advisor to Newark mayor Cory Booker, for Deputy Mayor for Education, and Hosanna Mahaley, who ran an Atlanta pro-reform organization, for State Superintendent of Education. Their strong education reform bona fides should put to rest claims that Gray would bow to anti-reform voters. (City Paper)

Zimmerman looks ahead: Outgoing WMATA board member Chris Zimmerman discusses the difficulties facing Metro. He says the real problem is Metro being chronically underfunded, and that governance debates are a distraction. (We Love DC)

Overhead wire bill approved: Among its other actions on Tuesday, the DC Council approved the overhead wire bill, allowing overhead wires on the H Street-Benning Road streetcar line and creating a process to authorize additional lines though never on the Mall or Pennsylvania Avenue. (Streetcars4DC)

Dulles Metro station far for security reasons?: MWAA is concerned that placing the Dulles Metro station near or under the terminal will create too inviting a target for terrorists. But it's unlikely that it would be a more attractive target than a crush-loaded train running under downtown during rush hour. (WTOP, Bossi)

Tell station managers about escalators: If you've ever wondered why some stations have one broken escalator and two going the same direction, it's probably because the station manager just doesn't know about it. Please tell them. (TBD)

And...: A few long time Washingtonians, including Mayor-elect Vincent Gray, reminisce about DC's previous era of streetcars (WAMU) ... Streetcar head Scott Kubly may run for Council (Post) ... Alexandria will install a BRT busway and signal priority in the median of Route 1 (NBC Washington) ... The Examiner has better details on Jim Moran's language on BRAC traffic at the Mark Center which was trimmed in the final defense bill.

Have a tip for the links? Submit it here.
Erik Weber has been living car-free in the District since 2009. Hailing from the home of the nation's first Urban Growth Boundary, Erik has been interested in transit since spending summers in Germany as a kid where he rode as many buses, trains and streetcars as he could find. Views expressed here are Erik's alone. 

Comments

Add a comment »

The Dulles Station thing is wacky. By that logic, shouldn't all passenger cars also be kept at a great distance from the terminal? You can pack a lot more explosives into the rear of a Town Car or Excursion than you can carry onto Metro.

by ah on Dec 23, 2010 9:28 am • linkreport

Wow. IS there any excuse MWAA will make to move that station further away? employee access. Viewshed. Too much construction. Terrorism?

Guys, if you don't have the money, say so.

But fucking over the entire reason you are blowing $7 billion dollar -- rail to dulles -- seems incredibly stupid. And weaseling out on every opportunity seems weak. If you were trying to save money, well, don't build it, and man up and so so.

Or better yet, just end the train near the long term parking lots and make everyone take a shuttle bus in.

by charlie on Dec 23, 2010 9:28 am • linkreport

The coverage of Rhee's successors forgets that Rhee's underlying policies were little different from that of her predecessor. The difference was her arrogant, often self-defeating style. The pros and cons of those policies still deserve serious debate....private management is often a failure and, overall, charter schools do no better than public schools. Some of the schools that went charter had previously done fund raising, etc. and their areas long had been destinations for parents staying in the District. There probably needs to be more attention to instructional methods, which have been neglected in the effort to put everything on the backs of teachers, with assumption thay are either good or bad.

by Rich on Dec 23, 2010 10:37 am • linkreport

speaking of reminiscing about streetcars, i stumbled into the Feb 1981 Harper's article about the american streetcar scandal (youtube) (wiki) -- The Great Transportation Conspiracy: A juggernaut named desire -- it adds a few more details that you may not know about yet (it's behind a paywall, but there's a weird/sideways pdf copy here).

i spend a lot of my time advocating for rail-based transit, in part b/c i think it produces a positive feedback loop of interest/investment, and i think bus-based transit is degrading, etc. but this one graph would seem to suggest that even electrified buses ('trackless trolleys') were preferred by riders. i know if i have to ride a bus in SF, i prefer the electric ones:

Electrified trains and trackless trolleys are not only cheaper to run than automobiles, they are substantially cheaper to run than diesel buses. Riders tend to prefer them to buses.
this quote explains why i believe TheCityFix/Shell/Volvo are always promoting buses, in particular, non-electric buses -- they drive car sales:
The buses, besides being built and supplied by GM and the oil companies, never had the same appeal for riders that the electrified transit systems did, and merely added to the allure of the private car.
apparently this Harper's reporter, after poring over court documents and interviewing lots of transit folks, saw the same thing as me, and he saw it 30 years ago.

[Erik Weber, who often writes/crossposts here at GGW, writes for TheCityFix.]

it wasn't just taxpayers that wanted to keep their streetcars -- it was the cities/transit agencies themselves:

"We were having great difficulty in convincing the power companies to motorize and give up their streetcars," [Irving Babcock, president of the GM truck and bus division,] testified. ... Cities refused to give up their rail lines voluntarily, despite the presence of these showcases and the best efforts' of GM salesmanship.
another supporting line for the buses-instead-of-streetcars-yields-increased-car/oil/rubber-sales argument:
But there were indications from the investing companies themselves that they expected their profits to come not from bus operations at all but from the sale of their products after electrified transit was destroyed.
and this is just a kind of cutting, funny dig at LA:
Perhaps the most striking example of what happened is in Los Angeles, which has become a frightening mutation of human life produced by the automotive gene.
i suspect streetcars in DC will be a huge success, and Gabe Klein will be the talk of the town once again.

by Peter Smith on Dec 23, 2010 11:00 am • linkreport

typo - Screetcar head Scott Kubly

As good a pick Tommy Wells is for committee chairman, I'm a little apprehensive that Kwame Brown is giving Marion Barry a committee & that he'll control a couple hundred thousand dollars.

by mch on Dec 23, 2010 12:00 pm • linkreport

RE: Dulles Risk

To copy/paste what I included when I sent in the tip:

Nevermind that casualty rate of bombing the Metro & terminals: rather small number of people standing on the nearby train cars & in the nearest ticket lines.

Casualty rate of detonating a bomb beneath downtown: greater number of people on more crowded train cars plus people in the towers above.

Of course, both of these disregard the strong foundations of the buildings, tunnel system, and any ground in between; and that it's almost inherent that the bombs being detonated would be luggage-sized at best... that's quite small in the grande theme of things.

by Bossi on Dec 23, 2010 2:08 pm • linkreport

Enthusiastic second to Eric's suggestion that Prince George's abandon Council privilege in land use. That's where corruption begins - as long as the Planning Board is emasculated by local political pressure and payoff of any kind, the chaos, underinvestment and bad habits will continue.

by Ralph Bennett on Dec 24, 2010 9:21 am • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or