Roads
Virginians: Ask your reps to oppose bad highway bills
Tonight, the Virginia Assembly's transportation subcommittee will discuss some bad bills. If you live in Virginia, please email the members of the subcommittee to ask them to oppose HB1998, 1999 and 2016.
This is especially important if you live in Herndon and Sterling (Tom Rust's district), or western Loudoun or Clarke Counties (Joe May's district), but it's helpful to email them regardless.
HB1998 would basically take all road planning away from regional bodies and give it to the state. In addition, state officials would be required to exclusively plan based on traditional traffic models with the goal of reducing "congestion."
In other words, VDOT would plan using exactly the flawed methodology that the TTI report uses. If one project increases speeds more but would primarily generate sprawl in one area of the state, while another improves access to a denser center that would enable more economic growth and less auto dependence, VDOT would have to go with the former, and regional planners would have no say.
HB1999 modifies the enabling legislation for the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (in the italicized paragraph) to make the same congestion goals a priority and also give priority to "evacuation route" projects. Since evacuating a metropolitan area quickly by car is simply infeasible regardless of how many roads get built, talking about evacuation routes is always just another canard that is used to push for a 1960s freeway vision.
Outer Beltway booster Bob Chase is reportedly behind both bills. Last year, he pushed other bills to also require studying or building these projects which will spur a rapid acceleration of sprawl in Northern Virginia, though smart growth advocates and more sensible legislators managed to block them.
HB2016 comes from Governor McDonnell, and would consolidate the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission, which manages Virginia's involvement in Metro; the Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission, which manages the commuter buses and local buses around Prince William and Stafford Counties, and the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority. This would reduce local control of all these transportation decisions, giving Arlington more power over PRTC commuter buses, Prince William more control over Metro, and the governor more control over everything.
The committee will start meeting at 5:00. If you can email the members before then, it will help persuade them to oppose these bills.
- Delegate Thomas Davis Rust - DelTRust@house.virginia.gov
- Delegate G. Glenn Oder - DelGOder@house.virginia.gov
- Delegate Edward Scott - DelEScott@house.virginia.gov
- Delegate David Toscano - DelDToscano@house.virginia.gov
- Delegate Eileen Filler-Corn - DelEFiller-Corn@house.virginia.gov
- Delegate Joe May - DelJMay@house.virginia.gov
- Delegate James LeMunyon - DelJLeMunyon@house.virginia.gov
- Delegate Robert Marshall - DelBMarshall@house.virginia.gov
- Delegate Thomas Greason - DelTGreason@house.virginia.gov
Comments
- Lower camera fines? Sure, once we have more cameras
- Favoring local residents would undermine charter schools
- Ride The Tide of light rail, Virginia Beach
- Latest data shows plenty of car-free living in DC
- Pepco Benning Road site is perfect for the NFL or FBI
- Gray administration holding up Reservation 13 for Redskins
- Will Green Area Ratio green DC or just hinder urban living?






by thump on Jan 20, 2011 5:01 pm
by David Alpert on Jan 20, 2011 5:21 pm
by Joey on Jan 20, 2011 5:44 pm
It isn't even on VDOT's radar and it won't be unless there is both federal funding and support from MD, neither of which will happen in the next decade.
These bills should be debated on their merits without linking them to "Bob Chase" as if he were the boogeyman.
by movement on Jan 20, 2011 6:35 pm
"Both bills will now be considered by the full House Transportation Committee Tuesday, January 25th after the House session adjourns for the day, and your continued support is essential.
At last night's meeting, usual transportation obstructionist groups opposed both bills. The prospect of requiring transportation dollars to be spent to reduce congestion and save lives in the event of an emergency terrifies such groups because employing such criteria means that their "priorities" don't measure up. Their goal is to dumb down, defuse and direct transportation spending to everything except congestion reduction."
http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=y9srkqcab&v=001vUitVcnL-0cuNn-AGSEQgxSLjbfCD_L7XjJFCufGFUvmD6FS2QhXQVwR5DqNhXM2qoycuJsls8rl8qUry9ODZIXPpw0z1d1-BSXWbUyPgDK1KVrdmygoHQ%3D%3D
by NVA cyclist on Jan 21, 2011 12:33 pm
by Jasper on Jan 21, 2011 1:15 pm
Add a Comment