Greater Greater Washington

Good environmental bills die, bad transportation bills wounded in Virginia House

The Virginia House killed bills to establish a fee for disposable bags and 3-foot bicycle passing this week. While one bad transportation bill is going strong, legislators sent the other two down a road that makes passage unlikely.


Photo by Keith Williamson on Flickr.

The House tabled one bill to ban disposable plastic bags last week, then did the same for a 5¢ fee proposal similar to DC's from Arlington's Adam Ebbin and a similar one from Charles City's Joe Morrissey to impose a 20¢ fee.

Bills to require passing cyclists with 3 feet of space, which would match one passed last year in Maryland, also died in the House this week, though one is still alive in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

The House did pass the bill letting bike and motorcycle riders go through stoplights if they've waited 2 minutes or 2 light cycles, and another clarifying that injuring someone after driving through a stop or yield sign or traffic light counts as reckless driving is still alive.

Two bad transportation bills suffered some likely-fatal wounds. HB2016, to consolidate three Northern Virginia transportation agencies and which was strongly opposed by most Northern Virginia representatives in both parties, was referred to the Joint Transportation Accountability Commission where it's expected to die. That's because one problem with consolidating these agencies is that each has taken on debt for various projects under various terms, and consolidating could create substantial legal headaches.

HB1999, perhaps the worst of all, would require that transportation spending follow the anti-livability "congestion" standard. The Transportation Committee referred it to Appropriations with no endorsement, which is tantamount to disapproving and makes it unlikely Appropriations will pass it. Its companion, HB1998, is the one that did pass in committee earlier in the week. 1998 forces VDOT to create lists of projects based on auto-centric "congestion" priorities, while 1999 forces spending to follow those lists.

The biggest fight will come over Governor McDonnell's "borrow money for roads" transportation plan. Smart growth and environmental groups came out against the plan, but powerful business groups are pushing it.

David Alpert is the founder and editor-in-chief of Greater Greater Washington. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He now lives with his wife and daughter in Dupont Circle. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Celebrate freedom! (Bags go in the trash.)

by John K on Jan 31, 2011 2:32 pm • linkreport

So if the injured person is still alive it only counts as reckless driving? I'm outraged by this.

by aaa on Jan 31, 2011 2:49 pm • linkreport

@aaa. Count your blessings. In Maryland if the injured person is dead, it counts as negligent driving.

by Jim Titus on Jan 31, 2011 6:07 pm • linkreport

Your characterization that HB1999 is dead because it has been referred to Appropriations is incorrect. In fact, it was reported out of the Transportation subcommittee this morning 7-0 and is now before the full committee.

by Anonymous on Feb 1, 2011 10:37 am • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or