Development
CSG's 2011 State of the Washington Region
Last week, you heard from both President Obama and the Republican leadership about our nation's challenges and opportunities. Today, we at the Coalition for Smarter Growth wanted to share with you the state of our communities and our region.

Photo by Bill Adler.
2010 was a great year for planning and creating the vibrant, walkable, bikeable and transit-oriented communities that are in such high demand. Great new plans passed for Tysons Corner, White Flint, New Carrollton, Potomac Yard, and Crystal City.
Fairfax County made transit communities a top development and environmental priority. Property values for urban and transit communities held up well in the real estate market despite the recession. And our outer suburbs began incorporating more smart growth principles into their community planning.
One of our biggest victories in recent years came when we saved Metro rail and bus service. Working with hundreds of you, we emailed and petitioned Metro's decision makers and our elected officials on behalf of Metro.
The District saw several pedestrian safety victories, and DC and Arlington launched Capital Bikeshare, the new (yet already wildly popular) bikesharing service. If you'd like to read more about what happened last year, take a look at our Top five Smart Growth moments of 2010.

Photo by Jon Reaves.
Today, our region is at a crossroads. There are several directions our region could take as we envision our future. But there is one path we simply can't afford to take: the direction toward more traffic and mounting infrastructure bills. For too long the government and private sectors have made decisions that snarl our commutes and cost us billions.
Highlighted in the Washington Post story Five things that keep Stewart Schwartz up at night, these decisions include where we're choosing to put our jobs We're not the first to say it, but it's time for fundamental change, and there's never been a better time for it. We live in our nation's capital, and it's time we become an example of innovation, problem solving, fiscal and environmental sustainability and prosperity for the rest of the country.
With limited available funds, we can't afford a continued business-as-usual approach where tax dollars are spread around like peanut butter. Throwing money at transportation without focus, whether it's through massive borrowing and debt in Virginia or a gas tax increase in Maryland, is inefficient and irresponsible.
Instead, we must target our infrastructure investments and prioritize a fix-it-first policy that will repair and replace aging bridges, pavement, and transit. We need to tie our investments to supporting transit-oriented, mixed-use walkable/bikeable communities, which can mean more money spent on local "complete streets" networks as well as transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities. We can also invest in operational improvements, such as better traffic incident response and coordination, expanded HOV, and bus priority lanes.
Looking ahead, there are five key opportunities we must take advantage of in order to secure a sustainable, competitive future for our communities. We call on our region's residents, decision makers, and our elected officials to join us as we move our region forward:
The problems in the Washington region are no different than those across the country. Aging infrastructure, huge federal debt, climate change, energy inefficiency, oil dependency, and severe strains on household budgets are all challenges that we must face in 2011, no matter where we live. Smart growth solutions will help us address these challenges.
Before we make new investments, we must remember our old ones and use a fix-it-first policy to improve infrastructure.
By focusing public resources for water and sewer, transportation, housing, stormwater and other infrastructure on redevelopment and economic development incentive programs in a coordinated way, our tax dollars will be used more efficiently.
Reducing our energy consumption seems like a daunting task, but already communities across the country are reducing their emissions by creating green, mixed-use, mixed-income, walkable/bikeable and transit-oriented communities. Part of that is making investment in transit, intercity rail, and local street networks a top national, state, and regional priority.
Like reducing energy consumption, we can reduce our budget burdens by creating walkable, mixed-income, mixed-use, transit accessible communities that offer the opportunity for shorter commutes, fewer daily car trips, less traffic, and greater energy efficiency. In Washington specifically, we must continue to address the east-west jobs/housing divide, create more housing options closer to jobs, and make residential and commercial building energy efficiency a top priority. Let's lead!
We can't say it enough: 2010 was a great smart growth year. But as we begin to choose our path for 2011, let's take what didn't work last year and create new opportunities.
Adopting a range of smart growth policies Laura DeSantis is the Online Advocacy and Outreach Specialist for the Coalition for Smarter Growth.

Photo from NBC Washington.
Comments
- Latest Metro map drafts add Anacostia parks and other tweaks
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Short-term Washingtonians deserve a voice, too
- DC Council makes major policy changes overnight
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- Public land deals have both benefits and pitfalls
- Parklets give every block a little park






In the grand scheme of things, of all the city's problems, "smart growth" is not one of them. Generational poverty, an unprepared workforce of residents, short-term politically expedient decisionmaking, and undisciplined government policies are far higher on the scale.
by Fritz on Feb 1, 2011 3:13 pm • link • report
Arlington: 45 million
Alexandria: 4.5 million
Fairfax: 50-100 million?
Montgomery county: 300 million?
PG County: 300 million
Total: 1.4 billion
How exactly does smart growth help on that?
by charlie on Feb 1, 2011 3:37 pm • link • report
by Tim on Feb 1, 2011 4:03 pm • link • report
Use the already paid for infrastructure.
Create multiple peaks in use so as to use the infrastructure more intensively.
Re-balance jobs and housing to increase the property tax base that supports the school system.
Smart growth is absolutely critical to fixing the budget problem.
by Brian DiNunno on Feb 1, 2011 4:19 pm • link • report
by David Alpert on Feb 1, 2011 4:27 pm • link • report
These deficits have to be dealt with THIS year. Smart Growth, like most lobbyists, wants money for things they like. I'm suggesting the money isn't here, smartgrowth isn't apparently doing the trick for property values, and oh, by the way the states are pretty broke too.
And this in the area doing best in the county.....thanks to federal spending.
by charlie on Feb 1, 2011 4:52 pm • link • report
Are you joking? Property values in urban and TOD areas has remained high while property values in other suburban areas (yes, even in the Washington region) have fallen off. Lower property values = less revenue for counties, which gain the vast majority of their revenue from property taxes. Just look at Loudoun County, which had to close a $200 million budget gap even though they have a quarter of the population of Fairfax or Montgomery Counties!
by Adam L on Feb 1, 2011 6:15 pm • link • report
Yup. Smartgrowth is just peddled by charlatans like the carbon credit idiots.
by TGEoA on Feb 1, 2011 7:34 pm • link • report
Plus, any blurb about walkable urban neighborhoods in Alexandria should include a reference to Old Town.
by Anon on Feb 1, 2011 8:14 pm • link • report
by RS on Feb 3, 2011 8:43 am • link • report
Re Budget deficits -- In addition to the excellent responses to this issue, I would add that there is substantial research showing that dispersed patterns of development lead to higher infrastructure costs. Water and sewer, school busing, police and fire, electrical service etc all cost more per capita when seeking to serve dispersed development. New urbanist studies show that we need more fire stations, each serving fewer residents per square mile, in dispersed suburbs and where there are disconnected street networks. The Eastern District Planning Initiative in the Charlottesville region showed that compact development would save 50% on road costs alone ($500 million). Finally, a core point in our piece is that we can't afford to build infrastructure in new areas, while also addressing our huge backlog of aging infrastructure in older communities -- communities where redevelopment would allow us to combine private and public funds to fix infrastructure.
by Stewart Schwartz on Feb 3, 2011 2:01 pm • link • report
Add a Comment