Transit
Metro aiming to start "Yellow and Orange Line service increase" in June 2012, without new color
Orange Line riders from West Falls Church to Rosslyn will get more trains, and Blue Line riders at Franconia-Springfield and Van Dorn Street will get more direct service into DC around June 2012, based on Metro's latest plans for what I call the "Yellow and Orange Line service increase."
This plan, which has been discussed for several years now, will create a few rush hour trains between Franconia-Springfield and Greenbelt via the Yellow Line bridge, and also from West Falls Church to Largo Town Center.
These will replace some Blue Line trains, but since these two services don't overlap, each Blue Line train will become two new trains, adding service overall.
This is especially important to make room for trains to Tysons when the Silver Line opens. The new West Falls Church-Largo trains will become Wiehle Avenue-Largo trains once the Silver Line phase 1 is finished in 2014.
After running some focus groups on how to communicate this change, Metro is moving away from the idea of adding a new line color for this service which will only run for a few hours a day, according to a presentation to the WMATA Board planned for this Thursday. Instead, the leading concept calls for showing a dotted Yellow Line branch from King Street to Franconia-Springfield and an Orange one from Stadium-Armory to Largo.
The new map may not look just like this one; the presentation notes that riders are open to a new look for the map. Assuming the Silver Line becomes a new color, which is likely given the way we've been talking about it for years, the lines will probably need to get thinner to fit effectively on the map. Such a change also "signals positive changes are coming," says the presentation.
The map won't be the only way riders find out about this change. Metro also surveyed riders on how they get information. Only 38% of regular riders and 53% of occasional riders look at the map before going through the faregates.
The survey also had some other interesting findings. Not surprisingly, many more occasional riders (30%) ask station agents versus frequent riders (6%), while more frequent riders (43%) use smartphone apps than occasional riders (13%). Less intuitively, occasional riders are the least likely to look at the color display on the front of the trains themselves (40% versus 54%), the destination side on the side of the train (42% versus 62%).
Fortunately, this plan of creating branches in the Yellow and Orange lines near the ends affects relatively few occasional riders, since the stations south of King Street and east of Stadium-Armory are primarily commuter stations and draw very few tourists. A few Yellow Line trains actually already go to Greenbelt at the ends of their runs (hence the sign in the photo at the top of the post).
Metro feels it is critical to introduce the changes in ways that riders can understand, which communicates the benefits, and which make it easy to navigate the system.
The presentation notes that the destination points (like "Greenbelt" or "Huntington") "are the critical piece of information." With more possible destination points, it might be worth Metro exploring ways to help people not as familiar with the endpoints, like "inbound" and "outbound" for people at stations outside the core; south, north, east or westbound; or other possibilities.
While all of the signs (over 2,600 signs in stations, 5,000 system maps, and 1,200 fare charts) have to be revamped, it's a good opportunity to tweak station names as well. While it's unlikely Metro will shorten them all, some station renamings have been proposed.
New York Ave-Florida Ave-Gallaudet U doesn't even have an entrance on New York Avenue, references two very long roads, and omits the name of the growing neighborhood it anchors. It could become the shorter NoMA-Gallaudet U.
On the flip side, there's been talk of changing Navy Yard to something like Ballpark-Capitol Riverfront-Navy Yard. Waterfront should lose the "SEU," since Southeastern University has closed, and the ANC wants to add Arena Stage in its place.
Comments
- Latest Metro map drafts add Anacostia parks and other tweaks
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Short-term Washingtonians deserve a voice, too
- DC Council makes major policy changes overnight
- Public land deals have both benefits and pitfalls
- Parklets give every block a little park
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools








by Froggie on Mar 7, 2011 11:31 am • link • report
I support the NoMA-Galludet U. one, since that shortens and simplifies a current bad name. That's a step in the right direction.
The other two are steps in the wrong direction. They both add terms to names unnecessarily. Please, stop the madness.
by Alex B. on Mar 7, 2011 11:33 am • link • report
by Jacques on Mar 7, 2011 11:43 am • link • report
by dan reed! on Mar 7, 2011 11:48 am • link • report
by Adam L on Mar 7, 2011 11:53 am • link • report
by PeakVT on Mar 7, 2011 11:59 am • link • report
by Matt Glazewski on Mar 7, 2011 12:02 pm • link • report
by Froggie on Mar 7, 2011 12:04 pm • link • report
As a commuter from Franconia-Springfield to Gallery Place, I welcome this change.
by SB on Mar 7, 2011 12:05 pm • link • report
When they really redo the map, I hope they will fix some of the horrific design elements, like the labels that are at a slightly skew angle to the lines (see Federal Center SW, Benning Road), the places the curves are oddly not uniform, and more.
by David Alpert on Mar 7, 2011 12:07 pm • link • report
My primary concern is whether they are cutting the number of blue lines trains to Rosslyn, which will make it harder for Arlington riders to get to national.
by charlie on Mar 7, 2011 12:10 pm • link • report
by Matt Glazewski on Mar 7, 2011 12:14 pm • link • report
Or the Pentagon and Crystal City, both major employment centers.
by Juanita de Talmas on Mar 7, 2011 12:14 pm • link • report
Try this post. It breaks it down:
http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/6336/metro-faq-how-will-silver-orange-blue-fit-at-rosslyn/
by Matt Johnson on Mar 7, 2011 12:16 pm • link • report
by Michael on Mar 7, 2011 12:19 pm • link • report
As I've said before: classify WMATA rail as commuter rail.
by charlie on Mar 7, 2011 12:26 pm • link • report
The change is for rush hour trains only. Off-peak service will not be affected. That means that during the midday, the same number of Blue Line trains will operate between Rosslyn and Pentagon as currently do.
by Matt Johnson on Mar 7, 2011 12:28 pm • link • report
I'd say that David does have some influence, given that previous presentations for this same concept were incredibly convoluted before GGW called them out on what was a very simple (and clever) service adjustment. I like David's mock-up a bit better than Metro's rough proposal (although supposedly that's also just a mock-up, so....)
That said, there will now be very few trains that actually run as the color Blue, following this change.
As for renaming, I'd propose "Ballpark-Riverfront" if we're going to rename Navy Yard. The entrance to the Navy Yard is actually pretty far away from the Metro, and its significance as a landmark has been eroding for many years now. The only downside is that this will confuse tourists.
I'll happily burn "SEU" off of every map and streetsign, and think that NY Ave could use a naming adjustment too (but agree that renaming could be painful/annoying in the short-term).
Also, the address on the big printed maps for the NY Ave station is dead wrong, and about 5 blocks from the actual station entrance. Hopefully, they'll fix that minor issue as well.
by andrew on Mar 7, 2011 12:32 pm • link • report
by andrew on Mar 7, 2011 12:34 pm • link • report
by charlie on Mar 7, 2011 12:36 pm • link • report
Correct. The services will operate in both directions.
by Matt Johnson on Mar 7, 2011 12:36 pm • link • report
Riverfront isn't much better. I know that's the Capitol Riverfront brand, but we have lots of rivers in DC and they all front on something. We'd also then have back to back stops of "Waterfront" and "Riverfront," despite the fact that they refer to two different bodies of water.
The Navy Yard has been there for hundreds of years. Much of the development will take place within the confines of what used to be the Navy Yard, as well - it extended all the way to 1st St SE.
by Alex B. on Mar 7, 2011 12:39 pm • link • report
Specifically, two.
by andrew on Mar 7, 2011 12:46 pm • link • report
SEU has been closed for how long? MU is how far away from Ballston? AU is how far from Tenleytown? Naylor Rd station is on Branch Avenue while Branch Avenue station is on Auth Rd? There are two stations with GMU appended to them...yes, I know there are two campuses. Tell me that isn't confusing.
The Navy Yard is one of the oldest things in Washington. Sure, let's re-name the station, who cares about the history.
by Keep it simple, stupid on Mar 7, 2011 12:46 pm • link • report
by Alex B. on Mar 7, 2011 12:55 pm • link • report
Additionally, as NoMA continues to grow and develop, a renaming of this station would help brand the area and new neighborhood.
by Josh C on Mar 7, 2011 1:00 pm • link • report
This is not a solution to the problem of not having enough capacity at Rosslyn, and downtown.
by Jasper on Mar 7, 2011 1:13 pm • link • report
by dcseain on Mar 7, 2011 1:14 pm • link • report
We should probably rename Rosslyn as "Rosslyn-Leesburg" because Loudoun County transit has a "Shuttle Bus" that can take you to Leesburg.
by Keep it simple, stupid on Mar 7, 2011 1:24 pm • link • report
by David Alpert on Mar 7, 2011 1:29 pm • link • report
Your sarcasm is unfortunate. MU is _three blocks_ from campus three blocks! That is, quite literally, walking distance. It's nothing like (say) Vienna/Fairfax-GMU and Tenleytown-AU, where the campuses are much farther away.
by Matt on Mar 7, 2011 1:41 pm • link • report
by Keep it simple, stupid on Mar 7, 2011 1:54 pm • link • report
I mean why not name it Tenleytown-Wilson HS-Janney ES-Whole Foods? When did it become a requirement of Metro to use the nearest place of any interest as the station name?
by campuses on Mar 7, 2011 1:55 pm • link • report
by Jeremy M on Mar 7, 2011 2:53 pm • link • report
If I'm correct, local universities, such as AU, Howard, and UMD pay for the name changes. In this age of universal technology, why can't people find out which station to exit? Metro has a fairly accurate trip planner, and most colleges and many businesses say which station(s) they are closest to. Metro also publishes maps that are available in stations that say how to get to destinations (Ie: National Harbor: Take the Green Line to Branch Avenue and ride the NH1 to National Harbor or White House: ride the Blue/Orange lines to McPherson Sq.)
by thedofc on Mar 7, 2011 3:00 pm • link • report
Inbound outbound direction changes at Metro Center and Gallery place as those two station are the geographic centers of all of the line in the system.
WMATA defines direction internally as follows:
To put it simple terms for Blue Orange and Yellow and any future service crossing the River between Virginia and Washington DC:
All train passing through the Potomac River tunnel: East - West.
All train passing over the Fenwik Bridge: North - South.
Green pretty obvious: North - South.
Red being the exception: To Shady Grove - To Glenmont
by Sand Box John on Mar 7, 2011 3:06 pm • link • report
by Michael Perkins on Mar 7, 2011 3:11 pm • link • report
The numbers are in the PDF presentation that's linked in the article. Currently, there are 89 passengers per car during rush hour on the blue line between Rosslyn and the Pentagon, compared to 106 passengers per car on the Orange line between Rosslyn and Courthouse, which is considered over-capacity. With this change, there will be an estimated 93 passengers per car on the blue line while decreasing orange line service to a much-more-manageable 90 passengers per car. While this may seem unfair to make the blue line more congested than the orange, there is also expected to be more growth on that line to make up the difference as well as increased service direct to downtown over the 14th street bridge.
by Adam L on Mar 7, 2011 3:36 pm • link • report
by Adam L on Mar 7, 2011 3:36 pm • link • report
Though I could be mistaken, I was assuming those numbers reflected Pentagon -> Rosslyn for morning peak and Rosslyn -> Pentagon for afternoon peak. That way they could be compared with the Oranage line trains heading in the same direction (into or out of DC) at peak times.
If "Between B/Y South and Downtown West" includes riders in both directions, than I have no problem with the analysis or conclussions. If, however, the analysis for people fraveling on the Blue line from Downtown West to B/Y South during AM peak were ignored, that would be a problem. It is not an insignificant number and should be factored into overall analysis.
by Jeremy M on Mar 7, 2011 4:12 pm • link • report
I wouldn't bet the farm on there being an even split between Silver and Orange line trains operating between East Falls Church and Rosslyn. I will hazard a guess that when all is said and done the split will be 8 Silver and 12 Orange. Total number of trains per hour on the branch will remain same at 10 or greater with those trains terminating at Tysons West (WestGate) and returning to VA-772 (Ryan Road Ashburn).
by Sand Box John on Mar 7, 2011 4:30 pm • link • report
by Reza on Mar 7, 2011 4:55 pm • link • report
by Reza on Mar 7, 2011 4:58 pm • link • report
I hate to bring up an old topic, but having routing information in Google Maps would go along way to easing any confusion.
by akg on Mar 7, 2011 6:35 pm • link • report
Waterfront should lose the SEU and that's it.
Navy Yard should stay as it is.
These new, long station names are extremely inelegant, and confusing. We don't need to name a subway station after every single, possible point of interest in the area! Arena Stage can do their own marketing and pay Metro for some ad space. Ditto for the real estate developers around the Navy Yard. Geez.
by nwdcguy on Mar 7, 2011 7:41 pm • link • report
Specifically, two.
Well, if we're in the season for renaming stations, we could pick one and call it Tiber Creek...try finding that body of water
by akg on Mar 7, 2011 10:20 pm • link • report
by Greenbelt Gal on Mar 8, 2011 8:49 am • link • report
Having two different destinations using the same color is confusing. (on the other hand, two different colors with the same destination is not).
Thus, traveling E-bound on an Orange Line train is confusing. It can go to two different places. Traveling W-bound is not--even if I board at Largo, because I know it's going through Arlington to Vienna.
Likewise, traveling S-bound on a Yellow-line train invites errors by riders ending up in the wrong place.
I'm sure WMATA could never get this operationally correct, but it would make sense to have the trains change color depending on direction of travel. That is, based on their destination. This makes the map difficult, I'll admit, although arrows such as are used to indicate one-way streets might help.
One option would be to call the E-bound train to Largo Silver right now; why wait? When it's W-bound, it can be Orange.
It's important to think about these things as though one is a passenger; a single passenger, making a single trip. Not a train driver, not a map maker, not an operations director. The best solution lies there. What will it be like to be a single passenger at a single point in the system? Do the colors/identities of the trains help me in my travel, or confuse me?
I don't know if my personal solutions are the best, but using the passenger perspective is the best way to search for them. Using this perspective, two destinations for one color is not a good solution.
(For a previous rant on the irrationality of bus numbers, click here)
by Steve O on Mar 8, 2011 10:58 am • link • report
And they want even fewer Blue Line trains on this route?
by Catoe No Mo' on Mar 8, 2011 3:51 pm • link • report
No. Your wait of 12 minutes was abnormally low. The wait for a Blue Line train under the plan would not be more than 12 minutes under normal circumstances.
by Matt Johnson on Mar 8, 2011 3:53 pm • link • report
Page 9 and 10 of the presentation are filled with errors, which makes the change sound much better for most riders than it really is. For example, they say 33,510 riders between B/Y south and DC/MD will benefit, but this clearly includes the 15,568 riders traveling to the west side of the orange line and "downtown west" who will actually see a service decrease from the change, as well as another ~3,000 who travel across the Potomac but originate at Huntington or Eisenhower and will see no service benefit.
They do the same thing with the orange line riders, including the 13,000 riders that board at Vienna and Dunn Loring and will not see a service improvement (although some of them will ultimately be on a less crowded train). And, only the ~2000 downtown orange line riders traveling west of Rosslyn will see any improvement in service, not the stated 12,497.
Somewhat surprisingly, the Green line number is about right (at least for number of passengers affected, we'll get to the time savings in a minute), leaving ~66,000 passengers benefiting, not 108,000.
They also undercount the number negatively affected, leaving out the ~5,000 passengers that travel south from Rosslyn on the blue line during the AM peak period.
The time savings/increase calculations are likewise inaccurate. 15% of the B/Y riders will save three minutes for a total savings of 110 hours, under 10% of the orange riders (assuming no one is unable to get on a train) will save about 2-3 minutes, for a total of 80 hours saved, the reverse orange riders will save about 10 hours combined, and Green Line riders will save about 130 hours, for 330 total hours saved. However, 30% of the blue line riders negatively affected will have to wait six additional minutes for a train, giving a total commute increase of ~600 hours for these riders. Some of these riders will be able to cut their losses by riding across the Potomac on the yellow route, but the total commute time lost throughout the system will still exceed the time gained, despite the greater number of total riders benefiting from the change.
Clearly this is a needed improvement for the orange crush riders, who will see significantly less crowding on 6 of the 19 trains now going through the system and less days where they have trouble getting on any train at all) and going forward for the Silver Line, but there's no need to misrepresent things. This is going to have a significant negative effect on many blue line commuters, both in longer waits and more crowded trains.
Sorry this post is so long (and late), hopefully at least one person reads it. I'd also like to check their estimate of how many riders will divert their routes to match the new service, as well as a more thorough look at how crowded the trains on each line will be under the new scenario.
by Tim G on Mar 8, 2011 11:30 pm • link • report
It also seems like Metro is now planning to run the Silver Line past Stadium-Armory, which is quite smart, since it means the dashed part of the Orange Line will be replaced with an extended regular line.
One issuse I do have is that Metro seems to still regard Mt. Vernon as one of the (three!) endpoints of the Yellow Line. Trains need to just run at least to Fort Totten at all hours, for simplicity's sake if nothing else.
by jakeod on Mar 9, 2011 2:36 am • link • report
by jakeod on Mar 9, 2011 2:39 am • link • report
The Yellow Line cannot terminate at Fort Totten during rush hour. Extending all Yellow Line trains to Greenbelt is not feasible either.
Here's why: http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/6335/
by Matt Johnson on Mar 9, 2011 7:43 am • link • report
The problem I have is that Metro's statistics on how many people benefit and the time savings are inaccurate. On a daily basis, ~10,000 people will see a benefit, and 6,000 will be negatively affected, and the net result is actually an average increase in trip times over all riders.
I'm actually not totally opposed to the change since something needs to be done about the orange chokepoint through Rosslyn, but I don't like that Metro has continually given inaccurate perceptions about the effect of the changes and I'm not sure that the proposed solution is the best solution.
by Tim G on Mar 9, 2011 9:33 am • link • report
If WMATA is going to change the destinations of some trains it needs to be done with thought and consideration. Fix all signs to mention appropriate info update next train and remind the operators to not make mistakes when listing destinations or next stations. Many of the bus routes that were changed in December still have the old destinations and times on nextbus, so I higly doubt WMATA will be able to do this without causing problems.
by kk on Mar 9, 2011 10:37 am • link • report
Regarding "King Street/Miami," why stop there? Rename the airport stop to "Reagan Airport/Seattle" because Seattle is the furthest city with a nonstop.
by Rich on Mar 9, 2011 1:34 pm • link • report
Nevertheless, "inbound" and "outbound" are very useful descriptions for non-local riders who aren't familiar with the stops but just want to get on a train going the right way.
by David desJardins on Mar 10, 2011 12:32 pm • link • report
In the case of NoMa I'm not a fan of naming the station after the neighborhood, since it is an abbreviation and a marketing term rather than a geographical designation. "Florida Ave-Gallaudet U" would be a fine shortening of that station's name, but honestly, because New York Avenue is such a major thoroughfare responsible in part for the area's pre-Metro development, I don't have a problem with the name staying as it is.
by Omar on Mar 11, 2011 11:48 am • link • report
by Aaron on Mar 11, 2011 1:19 pm • link • report
by Basement Gnome on Mar 11, 2011 11:08 pm • link • report
by Chuck Coleman on Mar 13, 2011 9:09 pm • link • report
+1 on using symbols to convey destination information.
by Chuck Coleman on Mar 13, 2011 9:10 pm • link • report
You mean signs like this one at Fort Totten?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/39017545@N02/4580148101/
by Matt Johnson on Mar 13, 2011 9:11 pm • link • report
Add a Comment