Transit
Improve the Circulator, but raise the fare
DDOT is eying the Circulator for cuts and/or fare increases. The Circulator has been very valuable and should continue to expand, including fixing problems with the Navy Yard route, but equalizing fares between Circulator and Metrobus addresses a basic inequity while raising needed revenue.
Photo by DDOTDC on Flickr.
Circulator routes have provided some valuable transit service where demand has recently grown. For example, the Woodley Park-Adams Morgan-Columbia Heights-McPherson Square route has supplemented busy buses on 14th Street and connected neighborhoods with significant new housing and retail.
That route quickly became the Circulator's 2nd busiest within months of its launch in April of 2009, serving 126,000 rides in January. It is also the cheapest, only costing $2.28 per ride in November compared to $2.92 for the next cheapest, Georgetown-Union Station and $3.18 for the system overall.
The new Rosslyn-Georgetown-Dupont route, which replaced the old Blue Bus, became the Circulator's 3rd busiest as soon as it launched last September, and provided almost 68,000 rides.
Circulator ridership per line, 2006-present. Image from the Circulator dashboard.
Other lines are not faring so well. The The Mall Circulator is a great idea, but as long as it's restricted to run on outer loop roads and the Park Service refuses to even publicize it, it's limited. In July, it served 3,463 rides in 54 hours of service, or 64 riders per hour, while the 14th/Columbia route served 124,465 rides over 562 hours of service in the same month for 221 riders per hour.
The Union Station-Navy Yard-Ballpark route is the most costly, at $4.66 per rider in November. At last week's DDOT hearing, representatives of the area BIDs suggested that this route is hamstrung by very limited hours, an inconvenient pickup location in the Union Station garage, and a circuitous route through the Capitol complex.
| E/W | N/S | WAM | USN | DGR | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Costs | $511,744 | $194,725 | $253,712 | $146,734 | $214,706 | $1,321,622 |
| Revenue | $121,951 | $24,017 | $67,350 | $22,959 | $45,877 | $282,154 |
| Subsidy | $389,793 | $170,709 | $186,362 | $123,775 | $168,829 | $1,039,468 |
| Ridership | 174,970 | 40,133 | 111,265 | 31,489 | 58,420 | 416,227 |
| Cost/rider | $2.92 | $4.85 | $2.28 | $4.66 | $3.68 | $3.18 |
| Farebox recovery | 24% | 12% | 27% | 16% | 21% | 21% |
| Revenue/rider | $0.70 | $0.60 | $0.61 | $0.73 | $0.79 | $0.68 |
| Subsidy/rider | $2.23 | $4.25 | $1.67 | $3.93 | $2.89 | $2.50 |
| Hours | 6,591 | 2,436 | 3,184 | 1,764 | 2,195 | 16,169 |
This route may be worth expanding in hours if the route can be modified to take a straighter and more understandable path. Simple routes are one of the strengths of the other lines, especially the original east-west route on K and M Streets and north-south on 7th and 9th.
DDOT therefore is considering cutting the Mall route and using the money to extend the Navy Yard route until 9 pm except Sundays. Despite the Circulator being originally designed in large part around tourists as well as DC residents, 80% of riders live in DC.
The other debate will center around raising the Circulator fare. Right now, the $1 fare is simple and certainly affordable, but it's also far less than the $1.50 with SmarTrip and $1.70 cash on Metrobus.
This creates equity issues and strange political pressures. It does indeed seem unfair that riders at 14th and L can choose a cheaper bus if they're going no farther north than Columbia Heights, but have to take the pricier bus if going to Petworth or Brightwood. The cheaper bus takes a left turn through generally more affluent areas than the pricer bus. Why should this be?
If a simple cash fare is a goal for the Circulator, raise the fare to $2 for cash and $1.50 for SmarTrip.
The BIDs argued against raising the fares beyond $1 at last week's hearing. According to Karyn LeBlanc of the Downtown BID, the Georgetown Blue Bus, predecessor to the current Dupont-Georgetown-Rosslyn Circulator route, originally charged $1.50. When they changed it to $1, the ridership jumped so much that total revenues increased, LeBlanc said.
It could be that some of that came from the added publicity around the change, though there surely is some elasticity of demand. However, it's simply hard to justify charging a cheaper rate for this bus between two of DC's richest neighborhoods and Virginia than all the buses east of the river.
Speaking of east of the river, pressure began to mount last year to bring a Circulator across the Anacostia. In fact, Councilmembers all over the city started wanting one in their own wards. Maybe more routes in all wards including east of the river are the answer, or maybe the money would be better spent improving existing bus service.
That's a decision that DDOT, WMATA, and the Council should make in consultation with residents based on people's real mobility needs. With the Circulator being newer, sexier, more frequent, and most of all cheaper, the gut desire to get a Circulator at times has outshone more sober transportation planning. Equalizing the fares will remove most of this perverse incentive.
DDOT will present their plans for the Circulator at a public forum next Thursday, March 17th, 6:30-8 pm at the Courtyard Marriott Hotel, 140 L Street, SE near the Navy Yard Metro.
 | David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington. He has had a lifelong interest in great cities and great communities. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater.   |
Comments
- Successful speed cameras require fair speed limits
- Amid scandal, don't lose sight of Gray's policy achievements
- Montgomery plans 160-mile, "gold standard" BRT system
- VDOT ignores own data, pushes widening I-66
- DC's parks are 5th best in the nation, says "Park Score"
- Bethesda gets new but terrible bike racks
- DC's divide need not be black and white
The Navy Yard route is hamstrung by there being nothing at the Navy Yard.
by aaa on Mar 8, 2011 1:57 pm
I saw the ridership increase on BB once they cut the fare. And it had nothing to do with publicity.
Estimates of elasticity are based on commuters -- who will pay a lot to get to work. Circulator is great because it for non-work.
Keep it at $1. Cut the mall and navy yard routes out, and just have the 14th street one go up and down 14th.
by charlie on Mar 8, 2011 1:58 pm
by Albert on Mar 8, 2011 1:59 pm
Albert: Yes, that's not the subsidy per rider, but the total cost. The subsidy is less. I've added the table I got with the numbers so you can see the rest of the numbers.
by David Alpert on Mar 8, 2011 2:06 pm
by charlie on Mar 8, 2011 2:14 pm
by David Alpert on Mar 8, 2011 2:18 pm
by se on Mar 8, 2011 2:26 pm
by Ward 2 on Mar 8, 2011 2:28 pm
by EJ on Mar 8, 2011 2:36 pm
My personal view on this is informed by Jarrett Walker's recent musings on branding of bus lines by color. DC has created a specific brand that has been very successful: Circulator buses are known to have a specific set of properties, including a) short headways; b) cheap fares; c) local service (in the sense of serving a small geographic area); and d) friendly drivers.
These characteristics seem to me to be opposed to many of the major metrobus routes (but by no means all of them), which often seem to have a) long headways/bunching problems; b) more cost, including for express; c) radial orientation/long trip distances; and d) actually also friendly drivers in my experience. However, a lot of more local lines -- the D lines, for example, as opposed to the 30s -- share more characteristics with Circulators than with long-haul routes (e.g. headway predictability).
It seems to me that a more thorough reconsideration of Circulator and its relationship with Metrobus is in order. If DC is going to run its own bus line, then perhaps certain Metrobus lines should be rebranded as Circulator routes, or otherwise differentiated from radial routes. The Local/Express metrobuses do this to some extent, but not in a complete way (many buses are unbranded, and it's hard to distinguish local and express without close examination) and without integration with Circulator or truly "local" routes (i.e., those routes that serve a small geographic area versus those that make many stops).
To make this system understandable, it would be nice to show clear differences among Metrobus lines either by assigning some existing lines Circulator status (perhaps with a second color to show headway, e.g. blue circulator=30min headway?) and to make those lines on par with Circulator cost-wise. Radial routes would stay with Metro.
by reader on Mar 8, 2011 2:40 pm
by tour guide on Mar 8, 2011 2:45 pm
At $1, I find the K street line sometimes convenient for getting from one end of downtown to the other. At $2, walking or taking my chances with the orange line become more attractive.
by Brandon on Mar 8, 2011 2:46 pm
by Steve S. on Mar 8, 2011 2:48 pm
So why is the circulator cheaper to operate than MetroBus? Is it the new vehicles? Or a different labor contract or something like that? Because if it's a systemic advantage, why not just extend the more efficient system over the less efficient one?
Circulator service is contracted out to First Transit. They pay their drivers less than WMATA, benefits are worse, etc. I'm not sure of the specifics but I believe their compensation is much lower than WMATA drivers.
by MLD on Mar 8, 2011 2:50 pm
Why not create a peak fare increase (7-9 am, and 4-6 pm), to increase income from the commuter crowd, which is not likely to find a less expensive route, and therefore much less price-elastic. This goes especially for people like me who receive transit benefits from the office.
by Jacques on Mar 8, 2011 3:05 pm
by nathaniel on Mar 8, 2011 3:37 pm
by guest on Mar 8, 2011 3:42 pm
An example: I found myself with a handful of purchases from DCUSA last night and needed to get home near 15th & P - about a 1 mile trip. I could have taken the 50s buses ($1.50, 10-15 minutes), the Circulator ($1, 5-8 minutes), or CaBi (~10 minutes and at $75 for the year its a better investment every time I take it - so we'll call it free for this comparison). Of course, the buses were a better option for carrying my unwieldy purchases, but I was willing to try the handy front rack on a CaBi.
I saw on my phone that next Circulator was about a 10-minute wait. I could have hopped the 52 heading my way, but I thought $1.50 was too steep for such a short ride. So I ended up walking to CaBi.
Last night, CaBi won for me, but there will be times when a $1 Circulator trip will win. The $1.50 Metrobus making all stops will never win for me on such a short route. Metrobus just works better for trips longer than I'm willing to bike. The Circulator is like the bicycle for people who don't feel like biking.
How about an annual pass for the Circulator. Once you've sunk the cost (like CaBi) it benefits you to use the system as much as possible. How about $150/year for a joint CaBi/Circulator pass?
by KG on Mar 8, 2011 4:13 pm
The problem with the Navy Yard rt. is that I can walk from Union Station to Eastern market faster than the bus.
Interesting comment about a circulator identity crisis. May be something there.
Don't raise the price.
by beatbox on Mar 8, 2011 4:27 pm
The AM/CH route cannibalizes other bus routes and is poorly designed as a Neighborhood Circulator. IT's no more than a Graham political payoff to some folks who don't want to ride the bus with the "others" and to bailout the failed 98 mini bus route that had a $0.25 fare. This route needs to be completely redesigned.
As a matter of fairness the fare should be raised.
by W Jordan on Mar 8, 2011 4:39 pm
by Shipsa01 on Mar 8, 2011 4:41 pm
I think you nailed the reason the Mall line is terrible. It does not service the Lincoln, Vietnam, Korean, or the FDR memorial. Taking the route across to Arlington and then back would increase ridership drastically, in my opinion.
Anyone else notice that the meeting is scheduled for the Thursday of St. Patrick's Day, and also for anyone else who watches college basketball, the opening day of the NCAA tournament. I do not want to speculate about what this might imply, but could it be possible that they would not want any of the younger crowd to stop by the forum?
by Ryan on Mar 8, 2011 4:49 pm
by ErikD on Mar 8, 2011 5:10 pm
They do run. I use them most of the time I go to games (15 or so times a year), and they are usually an efficient trip to Union Station.
by thedofc on Mar 8, 2011 6:08 pm
by movement on Mar 8, 2011 7:49 pm
Have it going from Navy Yard to the Florida Ave Market (best turn around point closest to the redline).
The majority of the route would be down 8th, allowing the bus to hit Barracks Row/EM, and H street. It would also provide H street with a frequent connection to Metro.
by Will on Mar 8, 2011 8:43 pm
Does anyone have info on the N22 Metrobus line how did its ridership compare to the current Circulator route. I have a feeling it is a combination of the route around the Capitol plus the number of stops compared to the N22.
They should be studying the 96, 30's, N22 Metrobus lines and perhaps re-adjust some of the circulator stops to the busiest stops along those routes which the Circulator passes. The N22 was a lot more convenient than the current Circulator and would rather have that back over what we have currently.
Why not start the Circulator at Eastern Market then normal route to Navy Yard and from there pass Waterfront then go up 7th Street and then on to Union Station and just avoid the Capitol all together then kill the 7/9th Street line.
Can someone please explain why do the Georgetown-Union Station & 7th-9th Street line have stops that are closer together than the other three; the 14th Street has less stops than any other route with the Navy Yard line following right behind.
by kk on Mar 9, 2011 10:17 am
by eb on Mar 9, 2011 10:31 am
by m on Mar 9, 2011 11:17 am
Note to moderator: I clicked the graph, but I got a message that I think means Silverlight wants me to use Microsoft Windows. So, Silverlight is evil.
by Turnip on Mar 9, 2011 9:21 pm
2. Did I see the circulator heading west into Georgeotwn on M St tonight? I thought the westward route was changed to K St awhile back. (I was not a fan of that change: K St is spooky at night)
by Maggoe on Mar 9, 2011 11:17 pm
1. I assume is a joke since you're on this site, but I'll bite anyway: Capital Bikeshare.
2. Did you see the Circulator turn right onto Wisconsin or did it go straight? It was probably the Dupont-Rosslyn line.
by Shipsa01 on Mar 10, 2011 10:05 am
Not so good if you are transferring Metrorail, Metrobus or from somewhere along the street.
Until recently the Navy Yard route didnt have any stops near Union Station besides in the garage which made it was a b***h to get to if you were not inside Union Station.
If I was on Mass Ave or North Capitol ST I use to be able to just walk over to the front of Union Station and catch the bus, then you had to go to the garage and then finally they added stops on North Capitol & Mass + Mass & 1st.
Even now it is hard to find the stops compared to when they were infront at Columbus Circle.
All buses Metro & Circulator should stop in the same area to aid in having better transfer points, not having people walk blocks or go to the top of buildings.
by kk on Mar 10, 2011 7:58 pm
Add a Comment