Greater Greater Washington

Roads


Upper NW livability study, part 2: Circles and conflicts

Yesterday, we looked at the recommendations for bike boulevards and pedestrian improvements in DDOT's Rock Creek West II Livability Study. It also considered recommendations from several other studies, including traffic studies of two circles and a pedestrian audit of Connecticut Avenue.


Pedestrians crossing Chevy Chase Circle. Image from DDOT.

For the study, Parsons Brinkerhoff analyzed two large and often vexing circles, Chevy Chase Circle on Connecticut Avenue and the DC line, and Ward Circle at Massachusetts and Nebraska Avenues. DDOT analyzed Chevy Chase Circle in 2002, and Ward Circle had its own safety audit in 2009.

At Ward Circle, Nebraska Avenue cuts through the center while Massachusetts Avenue and turning traffic circumnavigates the edge. The earlier study analyzed the possibility of closing those lanes, as DDOT did to Thomas Circle years ago. The study estimated that doing so would, not surprisingly, slow traffic. The new report avoids recommending this, though it says such a move still might eventually be "desired for placemaking reasons."


Guide sign at Logan Circle. Photo by thisisbossi on Flickr.
Instead, at Ward Circle, the report suggests adding leading pedestrian intervals, where pedestrians can start crossing before turning cars get the green. More descriptive guide signs, like the ones at Logan and Thomas Circles, would help drivers understand the location of the different roads and what lane to use to reach each.

At the Massachusetts Avenue intersections, the report recommends adding traffic signals. This would help pedestrians cross more safely, especially as more development at American University increases the numbers of people crossing streets in this area. It would also simplify the merging and weaving between cars already in the circle and cars entering at Massachusetts Avenue.

At Chevy Chase Circle, the recommendations include the same guide signs, as well as large overhead signs for each cross street. To help pedestrians, the crosswalks to the center of the circle would get more signs and stop bars in the short term, and signals in the long term.

Finally, the study recommends signals where Western Avenue touches the circle, which would reduce delays for both Western Avenue drivers and those on some other streets where they often have to wait as cars come into the circle from Western.


HAWK signal in Alexandria.
Besides the earlier DDOT traffic studies, this report also includes a few recommendations from the recent Connecticut Avenue Pedestrian Action (CAPA) audit, such as a HAWK signal and curb extensions at Connecticut Avenue and Northampton Street.

Another CAPA recommendation, for adjustments to the intersection of Veazey and Connecticut, conflicts in some ways with UDC's own recommendations, and the Office of Planning is doing a streetscape study of the area as well. DDOT plans to integrate all three to create a final plan for this area.

CAPA also suggested narrowing the slip lane and adding a raised crosswalk on the south corner of Connecticut and Nebraska and retiming the signals to help pedestrians; these recommendations didn't gain the needed consensus within DDOT. Finally, CAPA wants to increase pedestrian crossing times at many intersections on Connecticut; DDOT says their safety and signals team is reviewing those recommendations.


CAPA recommendations for Connecticut Avenue and Veazey Terrace (left)
and Nebraska Avenue (right).

DDOT has many different groups that try to balance conflicting needs and often come to different conclusions about moving vehicles as fast as possible versus maximizing pedestrian safety. Sometimes one view wins out; sometimes another.

Implementing the recommendations will require money, though federal funding can pay for much of it and, at least for now, there are pots of federal money that have to go to pedestrian and bicycle projects. Everything in the Rock Creek West II Livability Study would cost about $9.4 million.

DDOT has identified funding for some of these items, though projects not completed quickly could wait some time. However, having a plan for pedestrian improvements makes it more likely that future road reconstruction projects or development projects would incorporate these changes, if DDOT hasn't been able to make them already.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Removing the Nebraska Ave cutthrough on Ward Circle would be a huge improvement. To me, circles only make sense when three or more streets intersect. Ward Circle is only the intersection of two streets, Mass Ave and Nebraska. An even better improvement for pedestrians would be to remove the circle completely and create a regular stoplight intersection.

by keithdc on Mar 15, 2011 4:09 pm • linkreport

I agree, make the intersection of Nebraska and Mass a regular intersection and the confusion is avoided. It will be more pedestrian friendly, and will work with a potential bike lane connecting AU to Tenley Circle.

On Connecticut Avenue, it doesn't make sense to do anything favoring pedestrian access to the middle of the circle unless the National Park Service agrees to actually tend it and make it a place worth going. As it is the circle is working as a circle should. I am not sure what is being achieved at a time when DDOT is unsignalizing circles and returning them to their original functionality.

by William on Mar 15, 2011 4:38 pm • linkreport

I could be wrong, but I think Chevy Chase "Circle" is actually a roundabout. I don't know about Ward, but I think that meets the definition of a "circle" because entry is signalized. The configuration is pretty strange with the cut-throughs in the middle, but I would strongly disagree that the best option would be to tear it out and put in a signalized intersection. Instead, redesign the entry and make it into a roundabout, place chicanes prior to entry points to control speeds so pedestrians feel comfortable crossing (isn't DC also getting cameras that detect when pedestrians are in a crosswalk?)

by thump on Mar 15, 2011 8:13 pm • linkreport

The circle at Nebraska and Mass makes no sense. It is confusing, less safe than an intersection for cars, much lass safe for bikes and pedestrians and wasts a lot of space that could be used for pedestrians. No one spends much time walking in the middle of the circle. Look at it on google maps its pretty big.

People will probably get upset about making the change, because people don't like change, but the circle really makes no sense. It is annoying. The land could be used more efficiently.

by mike on Mar 15, 2011 8:45 pm • linkreport

The could keep the circle at Nebraska and Massachusetts, but eliminate the Nebraska Ave cut through roads as done with Logan Circle, creating more park area within the circle.

by Douglas Willinger on Mar 15, 2011 9:01 pm • linkreport

But give Chevy Chase Circle an underpass much like that beneath DuPont Circle.

by Douglas Willinger on Mar 16, 2011 11:22 am • linkreport

Chevy Chase Village residents helped snuff the last effort to put signals in the Circle. http://www.gazette.net/gazette_archive/2003/200311/bethesda/news/148134-1.html.
Among other things, there were concerns that the outsiders might venture onto the Village's exclusive byways if there was perceived congestion at the Circle.

A solution is sorely needed. Driving westbound on Western through the circle during the morning rush is an awful form of auto-roulette, as a small but unhinged subset of Connecticut Ave. drivers refuse to yield (or even look) for traffic in the circle.

by MJ on Mar 16, 2011 4:07 pm • linkreport

I think there needs to be a lot of thought given to Ward Circle, especially with the potential new building at both American University and at DHS's Nebraska Avenue Complex on the eastern side of the circle (EIS of potential new building there: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/103830). There will be a lot of changes coming to the environment of this circle, and the solutions should be well thought through.

@ mike - The problem with a real intersection is that there is a statue in the middle of ward circle that is very unlikely to move.

by OhioExile on Mar 16, 2011 4:23 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or