Greater Greater Washington

Posts about George Hawkins

Sustainability


Live chat with George Hawkins of DC Water

Our live chat guest today, George Hawkins, is the General Manager of DC Water, the water utility for the District of Columbia.

Hawkins was formerly head of the District Department of the Environment and joined us for a live chat about two years ago. Today, he's back to discuss lead pipes, the impervious area charge, and whatever else you'd like to ask.

 Live chat with George Hawkins, DC Water(03/15/2011) 
11:54
David Alpert: 
Welcome to our live chat! George Hawkins will be joining us in a few minutes.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 11:54 David Alpert
11:54
David Alpert: 
Meanwhile, please submit your questions. We'll try to get to as many of them as we can in the hour, and questions that come in early have the best chance of getting asked.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 11:54 David Alpert
11:56
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
Hello everyone, George Hawkins at DC Water standing by to take your questions. I'm delighted to take part in this chat with GGW.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 11:56 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
11:57
David Alpert: 
Welcome! Thanks for joining us.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 11:57 David Alpert
11:58
David Alpert: 
Let me start out by asking this: I am a DC resident. Is my water safe to drink? How can I know?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 11:58 David Alpert
11:59
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
The simple answer is yes, the water is safe to drink. We've satisfied all federal standards since 2005. However, our one caveat is that contaminants can get in the system in the portion of the distribution system connected to your homemeaning fixtures in your house, lead solder, etc. If you have any concerns, please call us for a water monitoring test. You can call (202) 612-3440 to talk to our drinking water experts. We also have an FAQ (including our system-wide test results) at http://www.dcwater.com/waterquality.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 11:59 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:03
[Comment From StefanieStefanie: ] 
A couple years ago, the DC government was in the process of replacing lead pipes. My understanding is that that the project was then abandoned because it was determined that the risk of increasing lead contamination (ie., stirring up the lead) outweighed the benefit of replacing the pipes. Since my pipes were replaced, does that mean my water supply is at greater risk? If so, what can we do about that?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:03 Stefanie
12:04
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
Partial replacements (the public line is replaced, but not the private line if it is lead) periodically have a short-term increase in lead in the water after the line is replaced. If you've received a partial line replacement and are concerned about lead in the water, please call us for a free monitoring test at (202) 612-3440. Existing testing shows that the levels return to pre-replacement or lower. The orthophosphate in the water (an anti-corrosive) has proven to be an effective inhibitor of lead.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:04 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:04
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
The research still shows that replacing the full lead service line (on the public and private side) is beneficial in reducing lead exposure. Whenever there is a lead source, there is potential for lead in the water.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:04 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:05
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
For now, we only replace lead service lines when we replace water mains (the big pipes that carry water throughout the system). When our crews come through, we encourage homeowners to replace the private side at the same time, using our contractors so it's cheaper.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:05 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:06
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
We also have a voluntary program, where if a homeowner replaces the private side as part of a renovation, we will do the public side. We have grants and low-interest loans available for low-income customers.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:06 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:08
[Comment From StefanieStefanie: ] 
If the private line had previously be replaced, do you still get the temporary lead increase when the public line is changed?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:08 Stefanie
12:10
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
It's unclear, but the safe step is to assume that it would and take precautions. There may be a temporary spike, but it would only be because cutting and replacing the public side would leave shavings. Flushing would solve the problem.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:10 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:10
David Alpert: 
Thanks. We might come back to this lead pipe issue but a few people wanted to ask about plastic waste for people who don't use your services for everything.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:10 David Alpert
12:11
[Comment From Tom SherwoodTom Sherwood: ] 
Given environmental waste, what is the future of plastic bottled water? Will there be bans, deposit fees?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:11 Tom Sherwood
12:12
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
We hope there's much less of a future for bottled water than there has been a pastat least when not for emergencies. We're focused on restoring public confidence in tap water, and making it more available in public places. For an analysis of the benefits of tap vs. bottled (including the incredible cost savings), please visit http://www.dcwater.com/tap
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:12 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:13
David Alpert: 
Another related question:
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:13 David Alpert
12:13
[Comment From WHands80WHands80: ] 
Is DC Water working to combat the "Water Club/Water Cooler" culture in DC? It's horribly inefficient to drive H2O from PA. Instead, a better way to get drinking H2O is to filter on-site & let the existing pipes & gravity do the transportation.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:13 WHands80
12:13
David Alpert: 
Besides the Web site, what is DC Water doing to restore this confidence?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:13 David Alpert
12:14
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
We agree completely, WHands80. In fact, we provide guidance on filters for those interested. We're also starting a bottled v. tap education campaign, including taste testing at community events. We're working to make free water refills accessible in publicmore on that in the weeks and months to come. (more)
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:14 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:15
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
The complete contents of DC tap water and every municipal water system are available online and go out in the mail to every address. You never know what's in that bottle, because the companies who manufacture them aren't required to tell you.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:15 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:16
David Alpert: 
Taste testing seems great, but it's not the taste necessarily that many people are worried about. Are there ways for people to easily test bottled water? Cheap household testers?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:16 David Alpert
12:17
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
There isn't an easy way that we're aware of. Our water is tested in advanced labs using techniques that can't be done at home, which is one of the advantages of tap water. It would be great for customers to encourage more transparency in the bottled water industryeither in the form of voluntary or regulated disclosure.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:17 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:19
David Alpert: 
We got a Zero Water filtering pitcher which comes with some kind of tester, but I don't know how good it is. However, it shows something like 006 on water that comes out of there, and more like 400-something on the water from our tap (and similarly high from the water from our fridge filter). Is this testing something real or is it some kind of gimmick?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:19 David Alpert
12:21
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
Tap water contains particulates that aren't necessarily harmful, but are measured by that test and removed by the filter. Some of those are added during the drinking water treatment process, to make sure the water is clean and safe. From our perspective, this is a good filter, but there is no safety comparison between it and unfiltered water.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:21 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:23
David Alpert: 
A lot of people are trying different filters. Some people I know have whole house filters. Others have under-sink ones, or pitcher ones. Should people worried about water quality get these? Can you provide any guidance on what to think about?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:23 David Alpert
12:24
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
Yes, we can. The most important thing is that filters are certified by the National Sanitation Foundation, which would show an NSF-certified logo on the package. Every filter is certified to remove different contaminants, so the first thing is to decide what you want to remove and make sure you get the right kind. For lead, you want Standard 53. (more)
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:24 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:25
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
We typically don't recommend whole-house filters, because they remove chlorine or chloramine and you don't have disinfection protection for your household pipes. We see bacterial growth in these kinds of situations. The better thing to do is filter where you're using the water. (Point of use, rather than point of entry.) We have a water filter guide on our website at http://www.dcwater.com/waterquality. Be sure to replace cartridges as recommended by manufacturerotherwise water quality can be worsened.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:25 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:27
David Alpert: 
Thanks, that's helpful. One last question on safety. I appreciate the thorough testing you seem to do. Still, as a resident who is worried about water quality, I am concerned about just saying the water meets government standards. Aren't the standards kind of lenient? After all, the CDC said DC's water was safe when it really wasn't. And I know you weren't there at the time, but your organization was not exactly honest at certain times. How do we know that this apparent safety is real?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:27 David Alpert
12:28
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
Excellent question. We have adopted a strategy to go beyond regulatory requirements. We aim to meet stricter target levels than required by EPA. And though we're meeting them, we always aim to be lower. We are providing filters and monitoring during lead service replacement, which we didn't do before. As science continues to advance, we are able to detect more things in the water than we once could, but that doesn't necessarily mean a health risk. (more)
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:28 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:30
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
Our perspective is that protecting the public health is the most important task we face. We now take a protective measure first even when the risk is not fully known (such as a boil water alert in 2009 in Shepherd Park, and the do-not-use advisory in Upper Northwest in 2010, neither of which were scenarios where public health was actually impacted). We're also working closely with water-quality advocates on our public outreach, and we're engaged in independent research to advance science outside of the regulatory framework.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:30 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:30
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
We can and will always do better.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:30 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:30
David Alpert: 
OK, enough on lead and other contaminants. Some people wanted to ask about infrastructure.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:30 David Alpert
12:30
[Comment From Ms VMs V: ] 
There are several miles of sewer & water pipes that are past their useful life. What is the plan to replace those pipes & how long will it take? Are there new technologies to sustain the system?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:30 Ms V
12:32
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
We love this question. This is a nationwide crisis of epic proportionas the American Society of Civil Engineers recently ranked water and sewer infrastructure as a D-. That's actually generous. In the District, the Board of DC Water has tripled our replacement rate to double the national average, or 1 percent of our system a year. This still isn't fast enough, and our view is there should be massive federal infrastructure investmentjust like for roads and bridgesto upgrade a system that sustains life.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:32 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:33
[Comment From Michael PMichael P: ] 
How do Federal buildings and property contribute financially to the local water system?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:33 Michael P
12:34
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
The federal government is a customer, certainly one of our largest. (If you added all the federal accounts and agencies together, it would be the biggest.) At one point the federal government threatened not to pay a significant portion of the bill (the IAC), but a significant effort by the local congressional delegations reversed that decision. The vast majority of the federal money we receive is through rates, not direct appropriation.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:34 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:35
[Comment From Ken ArcherKen Archer: ] 
You have said that much of the problem with clean water in urban areas like DC is ultimately caused by upstream pollution, such that filtering by water agencies is like playing a game of wackamole. That makes sense to me. Why don't big city water agency heads ban together, like big city schools chancellors have, to speak with a common, louder voice on this issue?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:35 Ken Archer
12:37
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
We do have a Money Matters Task Force, which is the big-city water agencies banded together. The task force just hosted a congressional day here in the District, focusing on the costs borne by urban ratepayers. There's no question that the lion's share of water pollution today comes from nonpoint sources (such as suburban parking lots and rural agriculture), not wastewater treatment plants. You're right that our industry needs to speak with a unified and stronger voice.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:37 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:37
David Alpert: 
And on a related note:
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:37 David Alpert
12:37
[Comment From Geoff H.Geoff H.: ] 
Another question - could you describe the relationship DC Water has with WSSC. This is probably delicate territory, but what could be done to make the relationship even better?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:37 Geoff H.
12:38
David Alpert: 
(WSSC is the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, the water utility in Maryland suburbs outside DC.)
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:38 David Alpert
12:39
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
It's not delicate at all! WSSC is our largest wholesale customermeaning a customer whose wastewater we collect and treat. So the suburban jurisdictions served by WSSC are actually having their wastewater treated here at Blue Plains in the District, but not paying a bill to us directly like a customer in the District would. For example, suburban customers (including WSSC) fund 60 percent of the upgrades at Blue Plains itself. It's calculated by volume.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:39 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:39
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
(We believe Geoff H visited us recently on a tour.)
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:39 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:39
David Alpert: 
(And Geoff got a neat map, which unfortunately then some federal agency asked us to take down.)
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:39 David Alpert
12:39
[Comment From Eric FEric F: ] 
To what degree can bio-retention features in new streets alleviate the CSO problem? Should street reconstruction in the combined sewer area of DC minimize immediate run-off? I feel that if DDOT and DC Water were one agency, this would be a standard road design policy by now since there is a big financial incentive to reduce storm water surges on the combined sewer system.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:39 Eric F
12:40
David Alpert: 
Also, Geoff says:
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:40 David Alpert
12:40
[Comment From Geoff H.Geoff H.: ] 
I visited the Bryan Street pumping station - and I'm looking forward to a visit to Blue Plains very soon!
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:40 Geoff H.
12:41
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
Low-impact development is most effective at capturing first flush in rain events. We agree that LID should be an integral part of street and neighborhood design, in both combined-sewer and separate-sewer parts of the city. Our Clean Rivers Project to virtually eliminate overflow has to handle such huge volumes in large rain events that LID is unlikely to be able to do the trick by itself. (http://www.dcwater.com/cleanrivers)
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:41 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:42
[Comment From Neil FlanaganNeil Flanagan: ] 
DC Water owns some very nice property that is inaccessible to the public. Do you see a possibility for opening up some of those areas to public use? What would it take for DC Water to try something novel, such as building a driving range over a filtration park, as New York City is doing now?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:42 Neil Flanagan
12:43
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
Thanks for the compliment! Obviously, security issues for the water system are paramount. You might be thinking of the McMillan complex in Northwest, which is actually part of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington Aqueduct. Our Main and O pumping station by the baseball stadium is an historic property, and we're looking for ways to make that a better part of the community.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:43 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:44
David Alpert: 
Some people wanted to ask about plastic bottles and specifically about deposits.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:44 David Alpert
12:44
[Comment From AlexAlex: ] 
What about bottle collection? What's the future of bottle collection in D.C. and what kind of obstacles does D.C. Water foresee? Do they think a successful bottle collection program is possible?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:44 Alex
12:44
[Comment From Geoff H.Geoff H.: ] 
can we cycle back to the question about bottle deposits - I know that there was a push in the past to get a deposit (like they have in Michigan where I grew up), but it was shot down by a coalition that enlisted churches and others to claim it was racially motivated, etc. Long story short - much of this would cover things other than bottled water, but those bottles pollute a lot of the waterways DC Water is trying to keep clean (Anacostia, Rock Creek, Watts Branch, etc.). Would you be in favor of a bottle deposit?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:44 Geoff H.
12:45
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
This is probably a better question for the DC Department of Public Works, but the bag bill (which I began implementing before I left DDOE) is a great example of how legislation can change behavior to benefit the environment. Under the right circumstances, DC Water would absolutely support a bottle deposit bill. We spend about $500,000 a year on boats that pull trash out of our rivers, and a lot of it is bottles!
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:45 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:46
[Comment From TMTM: ] 
Can you give us a brief update on the massive Combined Sewer Separation Project? Do you know whenthe work on Q St. in Georgetown will be done?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:46 TM
12:48
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
For TM: The massive project is the tunneling project, but a small portion is sewer separation. O and P Street just started, and goes from Wisconsin to 33rd. We are replacing water mains in conjunction with DDOT street restoration. The project has its own website, which we believe is fixingoandpstreets.com. It gets updated every Tuesday. For more information about our big tunneling project, please visit http://www.dcwater.com/cleanrivers. We break ground on the first tunnel in the spring!
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:48 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:48
[Comment From Adam LAdam L: ] 
The story in the District I've heard is that much of the infrastructure in the District (like the sewer sysetm) was put in following the Civil War and that much of that original system is still in place. Can that possibly be true? I know that there is an ongoing effort to separate out the storm drainage system from the sewers (primarily in the rebuilt downtown area) but does DC seriously have 130-year-old infrastructure still in use?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:48 Adam L
12:50
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
Yes. The median age of a water main in the District is 77 years, and sewers are slightly older. About 120 miles of the system went in the ground before 1900, with another three miles or so predating the Civil War. This is not uncommon in older cities around the country. And it's a main reason why we have 400+ water main breaks in an average year.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:50 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:50
David Alpert: 
Speaking of that:
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:50 David Alpert
12:50
[Comment From Michael PMichael P: ] 
What's the long term strategy for addressing the recent water main failures?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:50 Michael P
12:51
David Alpert: 
There's the big CSO project, but what else in the meantime?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:51 David Alpert
12:51
David Alpert: 
Renee has a similar question:
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:51 David Alpert
12:51
[Comment From ReneeRenee: ] 
George: I understand that DC Water is undertaking a large tunneling project to reduce CSOs, but that it will take years for the good results to be achieved - what are you doing in the short-term to improve our waterways?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:51 Renee
12:52
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
The long-term strategy is to keep increasing our capital improvement program to replace these as quickly as we can. We are using analytics to target the best use of the dollars. We also have to beg our customers' patience, because even replacing 1 percent of the water pipes in a year is 11 miles. That's a lot of torn up roads and traffic delays.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:52 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:52
David Alpert: 
Michael also said:
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:52 David Alpert
12:52
[Comment From Michael PMichael P: ] 
I fail to see how replacing 1% per year keeps a system together unless the components last 100 years, which they don't.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:52 Michael P
12:53
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
In addition to the skimmer boats we already mentioned, we've reduced the amount of overflows 40 percent just within the sewer system itself. We're reducing the number of nutrients going into the Potomac every year and are consistently meeting or exceeding our Chesapeake Bay goalsto the tune of $1 billion in the last 10 years in upgrading Blue Plains.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:53 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:54
David Alpert: 
OK, in the last few minutes I want to get back to a few more water quality questions.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:54 David Alpert
12:54
[Comment From Ken ArcherKen Archer: ] 
I think that, given the history of WASA before you took the reigns, many DC residents trust VA Tech researcher Marc Edwards (whose tests of DC water were found to be more accurate than WASA's) above all when it comes to the safety of DC water. Yet Prof Edwards has yet to say publicly that our water is safe to drink. Have you asked him what DC Water needs to do for him to declare our water safe to drink?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:54 Ken Archer
12:55
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
We have not asked that explicit question, but we have recently partnered directly with Virginia Tech and Dr. Edwards on a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation study to evaluate how to effectively sample for lead in District households, and how to effectively communicate with customers on the issue.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:55 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:56
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
When will we be able to safely swim in the Potomac, Anacostia, Rock Creek and other local waterways? Wasn't that part of the point of the Clean Water Act? What is it going to take to get to this level of water quality?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:56 Guest
12:57
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
This is an issue we handled extensively when I was the director of DDOE. Our plan for the Anacostia, for example, targeted 2032 as the answer to your question. The CWA has been very successful at reducing pollutants from plants like Blue Plains or those that manufacture. But the new challenge is nonpoint sources, like agriculture and suburban runoff. While DC Water has a role, and a big one, in keeping these waterways clean, our neighbors do too. And we strongly believe it's not just up to our ratepayers to foot the bill.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:57 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
12:58
David Alpert: 
As a ratepayer, I agree! :)
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:58 David Alpert
12:58
David Alpert: 
Let's finish with one more question from a ratepayer:
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:58 David Alpert
12:58
[Comment From Ryan PatrickRyan Patrick: ] 
I do not have an AMR meter. My bill is estimated when I call to have a service person come read my meter and reconcile the bill, why should I not be refunded the difference for your incorrect guess? In fact, they noted to put in a new meter I would have to pay a plumber to put new fittings (5-way) so DC Water could then put in their new AMR meter. Does DC Water not have any licensed plumbers who can fix this, and what does that have anything to do with reconciling my bill?
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:58 Ryan Patrick
12:58
David Alpert: 
(An AMR meter is a meter the utility doesn't have to come read in person, but can get the information electronically, I believe.)
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:58 David Alpert
12:59
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
This is probably too specific for us to get into a general answer, but please contact my office directly at gmsuggestions@dcwater.com, and we'll get the top people in our Customer Service departments on the case to help you.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 12:59 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
1:00
David Alpert: 
Well, that's all the time we have, but thanks so much for joining us! And thanks to everyone who submitted great questions!
Tuesday March 15, 2011 1:00 David Alpert
1:01
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
I'm sorry we didn't get to everyone's questions. This is a great way to interact with our customers. The others are Facebook, Twitter (@mydcwater), with the email address I just mentioned, or by phone. Our customer service office is (202) 354-3600, and our 24-hour emergency command center is (202) 612-3400. Finally, we have town halls in every ward that just started. Let us hear from you in person! Details at http://www.dcwater.com/rates. Let's do this again soon.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 1:01 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
1:01
David Alpert: 
Also, thanks to Alan Heymann who was typing in George's answers. Alan clearly wins the award for fastest typist of any GGW chat ever!
Tuesday March 15, 2011 1:01 David Alpert
1:02
George S. Hawkins, DC Water: 
(Knuckles cracking.)
Tuesday March 15, 2011 1:02 George S. Hawkins, DC Water
1:02
David Alpert: 
Thanks again to both of you. Readers, you can continue the discussion in the comments section.
Tuesday March 15, 2011 1:02 David Alpert
1:02
 

 
 
 

Sustainability


An environmentalist says Gray is greener

The author is Conservation Chair of the DC Sierra Club and a member of the Board of Directors of the national Sierra Club.

From an environmental standpoint, the decision between Adrian Fenty and Vincent Gray is not difficult. Fenty has repeatedly disappointed with his budget, personnel, and regulatory decisions, while Gray has been the greenest Chairman ever.


Photo by M.V. Jantzen on Flickr.

Four years ago, Tony Williams was stepping down after eight years as the District's first pro-environment Mayor. He had stood with us in our various park-protection battles (including the defense of Klingle Valley and Anacostia National Park), supported Dan Tangherlini's visionary plans for new streetcar lines, and put Jim Sebastian in charge of the new Bicycle Office and given him an ambitious agenda.

He commissioned the Office of Planning to develop a terrific new development and preservation plan for the Anacostia, and signed several cutting-edge laws passed by the DC Council, including the Tree Bill, the hazmat train prohibition, and the Green Buildings law. He had worked with the Council to create a new Department of the Environment (DDOE).

But in September of 2006 the Sierra Club couldn't decide whom to endorse for Mayor. Neither Linda Cropp nor Adrian Fenty had been an ally previously. Both were big fans of paving Klingle Valley, and neither seemed likely to support the ever-greener ambitions of the Council. For the first time in many cycles, we made no mayoral endorsement. Gray won our endorsement for Chairman over green Kathy Patterson, to the surprise of many. He was simply stronger on the issues.

Since his election in 2006, Fenty has done a good job of continuing Williams' bicycle and streetcar initiatives, both of which are now more than eight years old. But by every other measure, the Mayor has been a great disappointment to environmentalists.

On Anacostia Park, within his first six months in office Fenty dismantled the Anacostia Waterfront Development Corporation, which had been charged with implementing the vision articulated in the Anacostia Framework Plan of 2003. He now wants to build 6 million square feet of commercial and residential development at Poplar Point, compared with the approximately 1 million square feet that had been negotiated during the Plan's development. Defending Poplar Point is the Sierra Club's top land-use priority.

Fenty put a good man, George Hawkins, at the helm of DDOE, but then repeatedly saddled the agency with bloated green-jobs programs that drove Hawkins and most of his senior staff crazy. Hawkins ultimately left for WASA (now DC Water).

Fenty also wouldn't allow Hawkins to express support for Tommy Wells' wildly-successful grocery bag fee bill, which passed the Council with nary a dissenting vote.

This year the Mayor instituted major funding cuts for DDOEmore than for any other agency. He then raided the supposedly sacrosanct "Tree Fund," transferring $539,000 of "dedicated" tree revenues into the General Fund.

As we approached the culmination of our campaign to force Congress to quit burning coal in the Capitol Power Plant, we approached the Mayor with an offer to put him in front of our campaign. We considered this a no-brainer given the obvious health impacts of burning tons of coal in the middle of the District, not to mention the global warming implications. But the Mayor wouldn't accept our offer despite the silver platter. Only weeks later, Congress caved in. Decades of coal-burning in downtown DC ended last year!

Similarly, reduced greenhouse gas emissions are the central goal of DC's new Sustainable Energy Utility. But Fenty recently proposed to reduce its budget by 85%. He then tried to slash the DC tax credits for solar energy installations.

Then the Mayor nominated Lori Leehis wife's best friendto chair the Public Service Commission, which regulates electricity production and sales. When I sat down with her she quickly revealed that she knew nothing of the subject, candidly admitting that she didn't even know what global warming is ("something to do with the ozone layer?") We managed to bump her down from Chair to Member.

The Mayor is also fighting us on the pending "MS4" stormwater discharge permit from EPA. We would like to see improvements in the draft permit, but generally support its rigor. The Administration is doing its best to weaken it, arguing that the suburbs should take the lead on water quality improvement.

Meanwhile, during his six years on the Council, Chairman Gray has always been a friend of the District's environmental movement. My records show that he has been a 100% green voter for his entire tenure.

Earlier this year Vince valiantly fended off Mayor Fenty's proposed cuts in next year's budget for sustainable energy development, rooftop solar, as well as basic funding for DDOE. This largely unheralded work came at a steep price, because other budget priorities had to be sacrificed. Granted, he wavered for hours on streetcar funding, but ultimately made the right call. This was, after all, a very tough budget year.

Vince has supported our campaign to save Klingle Valley since the days when Adrian was holding pro-road press conferences in the Valley itself. In responding to our recent political questionnaire, he distinguished himself from Mayor Fenty in his commitment to oppose over-the-top development at Poplar Point.

Gray talks to us. He attended the Sierra Club's Annual Dinner last Fall and gave a rousing address. This is a leader whom we can trust and fully expect to work with in the coming years.

For these and related reasons, the Sierra Club's leadership voted unanimously (10-0) to endorse Gray.

If we want Washington to take its rightful place alongside Seattle and San Francisco as one of America's most progressive environmental cities, we need an executive that will work hand-in-hand with our now progressive legislature. Gray has the vision; Fenty doesn't. And Gray will end the war-between-the-branches that has held DC in second gear for four years.

Sustainability


Where does your DC Water come from?

Do you know where your water comes from? If you live in DC, it comes from one of several pumping stations, but the one that serves you might be all the way across town.

On Thursday, June 17th, I was invited (along with other local bloggers) to a roundtable with the General Manager of DC Water, George S. Hawkins.

Mr. Hawkins spoke about the culture of accountability he is nurturing at DC Water, formerly known as the DC Water and Sewer Authority or DC WASA.

He discussed the ongoing lead-in-the-water saga and spoke at length about his interest and excitement regarding all things environmental (he was formerly the head of the District Department of the Environment). Other bloggers have recently covered many of these points, and Greater Greater Washington will have other posts about this soon.

One of the most fascinating things we learned was the structure of DC's water distribution. During our tour of the Bryant Street Pumping Station, we learned about the seven service areas that provide water to the residents and businesses of the city.

All the water DC uses comes from the Potomac River near Great Falls, is treated at the Dalecarlia Reservoir by the Washington Aqueduct (a division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers), and is then sold to DC Water. That water is then pumped to reservoirs all over the city. The reservoirs are located at different elevations, and they supply water to points below them. From those reservoirs, the water flows downhill (via gravity) to houses and businesses.

Here is their amazing map of the DC water system as of April 1985:


Click to enlarge.

The color coding represents the approximate elevation of different parts of the city. Blue water mains run along roads at the lowest elevations (between zero and 70 feet above sea level). Red water mains are located at the second elevation range (between 70 and 140 feet), green at the third range, orange at the fourth, and brown at the highest elevations. The red and green areas east of the Anacostia River are separate zones than those west of the river, while the lowest zone (blue) spans both sides of the river.

This means that the reservoir that serves your house isn't necessarily the one closest to your house, or even in your quadrant of the city! For example, our house is in Trinidad. While the closest reservoir is at Brentwood Parkway and New York Avenue (just north of Gallaudet University), we are served by reservoirs in Berkley and at the Armed Forces Retirement Home, both across town in the Northwest quadrant of the city.

Meanwhile, the reservoir nearest our house serves locations at the lowest elevations (below 70 feet), from lower Georgetown and Southwest in the west all the way to Rosedale and Deanwood in the east.

Some other examples of reservoirs and the neighborhods they serve:

  • The reservoir at Van Ness and 44th NW serves neighborhoods at intermediate elevations across the city like Brookland, Woodridge, and Michigan Park in Northeast; Columbia Heights, Mt. Pleasant, Adams Morgan, and Kalorama in the center of the city; and Foxhall and the Palisades in Northwest.

  • Two of the reservoirs at Fort Reno serve higher elevations like Glover Park, Cleveland Park, American University Park, and Forest Hills west of Rock Creek Park; and Petworth, North Portal Estates, Manor Park, and Takoma east of Rock Creek.

  • The highest reservoir at Fort Reno serves the highest elevations in the cityneighborhoods like Tenleytown, Chevy Chase, and Shepherd Park.

Neighborhoods east of the Anacostia River have had a persistent problem with lower water pressure. DC Water is looking to rectify that with the construction of the new reservoir and pumping station in Ward 8. The construction of the new Department of Homeland Security headquarters on the campus of Saint Elizabeths will greatly increase demand for water in that part of town, and Mr. Hawkins said it would be a win-win for the neighborhood and DHS to get the new reservoir built as part of the new construction there.

Cross-posted at The District Curmudgeon.

DC Maryland Virginia Arlington Alexandria Montgomery Prince George's Fairfax Charles Prince William Loudoun Howard Anne Arundel Frederick Tysons Corner Baltimore Falls Church Fairfax City
CC BY-NC