Posts about Kensington
Public Spaces
Plan preserves Kensington's assets while fixing its problems
For the past year, Kensington town councilmember Lydia Sullivan has been making fun of snobby suburbanites with Snoburbia, a T-shirt company and blog. But she's not laughing at plans to allow redevelopment along a stretch of Connecticut Avenue that's seen better days.
Sullivan and some of her neighbors have written up a website, called KensingtonDevelopment.info, to oppose the Kensington Sector Plan, which is currently working its way through the Montgomery County Planning Department for a second time.
Planners and town officials say it'll bring much-needed amenities to the area while making it more attractive, but Sullivan's concerned it'll allow too many apartments, ruining Kensington's "sense of place."
"We are just battling for the soul of a place that already is different from the surrounding area," she writes in one of many e-mails we exchanged over the past month. "Seriously, how many more generic, developerville town centers do we need in Montgomery County?"
The Sector Plan seeks to give Kensington something Sullivan says it already has: small-town character. They propose adding trees and wider sidewalks to Connecticut Avenue in the hopes of slowing cars down, by creating new parks and plazas were people can gather, and by using the new CR or Commercial-Residential zone, which will allow a mix of housing, shops and offices.
Nonetheless, the plan's been very controversial, particularly its allowance of taller buildings up to 75 feet on Connecticut Avenue and 45 feet on adjacent blocks. KensingtonDevelopment is especially concerned with the number of apartments that could be built. "Montgomery County wants density and more moderate-income housing in downcounty areas like Kensington. (But is this good for people in and near Kensington?)" asks one page.
"For the first time in many decades, developers could build apartment buildings in sought-after Kensington," says another. "The Plan could add between 501 To Sullivan, who's lived in Kensington for 18 years, the town is "Mayberry," she says, where its "tone of small-town friendliness" has been unchanged for over a century. In an e-mail, she told me a story about running errands with her 11-year-old son one Saturday morning. "I was out maybe an hour Actually visiting Kensington, meanwhile, tells a different story. The century-old railroad town, laid out by Brainard Warner in the 1890's and named for a fashionable district in London, has become one of the most sought-after suburbs in Greater Washington.
Yet in the 1950's, two state highways, Connecticut Avenue and University Boulevard, were rammed through the town, bringing with them a mess of strip malls and office buildings that's started to look quite shabby. Though both roads see thousands of people each day, they're a distraction from the gorgeous, intact Victorian homes that sit just a block away.
You can see it in the pictures people take of Kensington: search for "kensington md" on Flickr and you'll find pictures of the Mormon Temple, not of the town's adorable Antique Row. The Planning Department held a a photo contest for Kensington residents to find what they liked about their community, and almost all the entries depict kids or flowers, not architecture or public spaces.
Mayor Pete Fosselman, who supports the Sector Plan, is eager to see the Connecticut Avenue corridor fixed up. "With our six gas stations and now a pawn shop, zero night life, lack of pedestrian connections, automobile dependent state, deficient open space, and no architectural oversight, Kensington is due for a makeover," he wrote in an e-mail.
Fosselman has the support of other councilmembers, local businesses, and town residents, who say Sullivan's part of a "vocal minority".
Recently, Sullivan's taken the fight to Snoburbia's blog, where she wrote about how places develop character: We don't know why, but we feel at home in these places. We walk on uneven sidewalks. We walk by imperfect windows filled with objects arranged (without a chart!) by local owners who know their customers. The downtowns were built slowly, over time, by locals. You can live there whether you're a student or a Kennedy. This community formed because people live close together. But the urban form also allowed Georgetown to weather two hundred years of social and economic changes.
Kensington's had over a hundred years to age, but it lacks the urban form, the density, or the diversity of a Georgetown. Sullivan doesn't like "generic developervilles" like Downtown Silver Spring or Bethesda Row, but they're a lot closer to Georgetown than Kensington is.
Beyond the chain stores and new buildings are all of the things that Georgetown teaches us about how to make a unique, pleasant place. They put lots of people and activity in a small area. They mix different classes and incomes as much as possible.
And they, too, have grown over time. Silver Spring has been an urban center for nearly a century, and tall buildings have been sprouting up since the 1960's.
Allowing development in Kensington won't automatically turn the town into a lifestyle center. But restricting development will keep out the people and activities that could make Kensington an even more unique and interesting place.
Even if everything that gets built in Kensington under the Sector Plan isn't affordably priced (and not all of it will be), adding supply will still make it cheaper than it is now to live or work there. That lets people already living and working in the community invest there rather than being forced to go somewhere else.
Kensington today is a prohibitively expensive place to live. A search on real estate website HomesDatabase reveals three houses for sale in the town today, ranging in price from $489,000 to $959,000. KensingtonDevelopment points out that homes in the town sell for "an average of $150,000 to $200,000 more than equivalent houses" elsewhere, while a Post article on Snoburbia says Sullivan's own house is assessed at $675,000.
She tells me the town already has "200+ moderately priced apartments" in a 1960's-era high-rise just across the town line called Kensington House. But rents there range from $1,220 for a studio to $1,725 for three bedrooms, placing them out of reach for many working-class people.
On Snoburbia, Sullivan frequently explores the issue of privilege in her life. She's mourned the departure of blue-collar families from her street and thoughtfully examined the separation between race and class in her kids' high school.
In her latest blog post, she asks, "What happens to the small local pizza joint that has been here since 1967, where all the firefighters and police officers hang out? Will the Greek father and son owners be able to afford the rent in the shiny new building?"
These people are being pushed out of Kensington already by high housing prices due to a lack of supply there and throughout Montgomery County. Sullivan has an ideal of small-town life, but the version she wants is inherently exclusive.
Nonetheless, she's willing to admit that Kensington could use some sprucing up. "I want to see a cleaned up commercial area as much as anyone, and would welcome some apartments and new people. That's kind of exciting," Sullivan writes. Yet she also sees it as a zero-sum game, asking on Snoburbia, "Will my town's uniqueness, its sense of place, be lost?"
For Fosselman, the costs of not doing anything are much higher. "If we simply "spruce" up the town and go for status quo, Kensington will continue to deteriorate as other communities around us rejuvenate," he writes.
If a great place is built over time, that means it's always changing. If Lydia Sullivan really wants to preserve Kensington's "sense of place," she should let the town grow as it naturally would.
The intersection of Connecticut Avenue and University Boulevard in Kensington. Image from Google Street View.Think about some of the places that are revered, that have been for many years. Think: Georgetown, Rhinebeck, Telluride, Santa Barbara, Athens, Burlington and many others like them. They don't need "mixed use town centers" or manufactured "green space" and "pocket parks."
That's not the whole story, however. Places like Georgetown were built over time, but they're also very dense, urban places. Georgetown has a street grid. It's easy and pleasant to walk there. There are shops and offices, apartments and mansions, 19th-century factories and 21st-century embassies, all mixed together.
Development
Proposed Costco gas station is the wrong place, wrong time
Back in January, David argued that Montgomery County could better use the $4 million proposed for subsidizing a Costco at Westfield Wheaton. Costco is still coming to Wheaton. However, the County Executive's Office is now now proposing circumventing well-established gas station permitting processes through a Zoning Text Amendment.
There are many circumstances where circumventing existing zoning is reasonable. However, the environmental implications of a gas station make sidestepping the process misguided in this case.
Costco wants to open up at the former Hecht's site in Westfield Wheaton. Westfield wants to make a deal with them. Eastern Montgomery County and northern DC has a strong customer base and Wheaton has a Metro station on the line with the highest ridership in the system. Many people for miles and many Metro stations away would love to shop at another transit-accessible Costco. We don't need to throw our environmental zoning laws out the window for a very successful national business that already intends to locate in Wheaton.
In the past, I have disagreed with the Kensington Heights Civic Association. In this case, they have very reasonable concerns about having a new large gas station next to their houses because of their poor environmental record. In this case, they aren't anti-neighbors:
Having a Costco in the mall is seen by many in the community as a potentially positive development. The Kensington Heights Citizens Association (KHCA) position is to support the store.As I mentioned before, I don't oppose Costco in Wheaton. The store itself will bring foot traffic and more Metro use in addition to many more automobile trips. I don't think that a Costco store will help or hurt walkability in the short term. (In the long term, there could be disastrous missed redevelopment opportunities.) However, adding a gas station would cross the line into outright harm.Of great concern, however, to the citizens of the Kensington Heights community is that the Costco development includes a 16-pump gas station adjacent to our residences and the Kenmont Swim and Tennis Club.
We feel that it will negatively impact the neighborhood where there are 250 Kensington Heights homes within 1,000 feet of the station.
Looking at the above map, the gas station would not be immediately accessible by car from University Boulevard. A motorist wishing to purchase Costco gas would have to travel around Westfield Wheaton's winding ring road. They would then get in line for one of the 16 proposed gas pumps. The car infrastructure is not there to support the new gas station.
Since we're talking about a gas station, we're talking only about moving cars, not people. While that's a negative enough proposition, the Westfield Wheaton ring road is a private road and is not subject to county traffic feasibility studies. However, University Boulevard (MD 193) would be, as would Viers Mill Road (MD 586).
A Costco gas station is usually located on an ugly, gas-guzzling suburban arterial like U.S. 1 in Beltsville. While a Costco on its own in the mall could potentially have little effect on Wheaton's walkability in the short term, a gas station certainly would move Wheaton in the wrong direction in the Whirlpool of Induced Demand.
It is puzzling that the same Administration that wants to employ traffic test after traffic test in White Flint, limiting walkable development unless cars could be assured of fast movement, suddenly abandoned its car-centric traffic concerns when Costco came calling.
Please contact the Montgomery County Council in advance of the hearing on Thursday, May 20 and let them you know you don't agree with Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) #10-04.
Public Spaces
MoCo makes "public-private partnership" with skaters in Kensington
Dan Reed writes the popular blog Just Up the Pike, focusing on eastern Montgomery County. He'll also be contributing articles to Greater Greater Washington to further grow our coverage of this important part of our region. Welcome Dan!
Wednesday's Kensington Gazette discusses unrest over "K-town", a makeshift skate spot in a park behind the Housing Opportunities Commission offices on Summit Avenue in Kensington. Four years ago, Kensington skaters made an agreement with neighbors to take care of the space themselves, but a rotating cast of kids has led to a drop in upkeep and unsafe conditions for both skaters and users of the adjacent playground.
This is a literal example of giving kids a stake in the public realm, something I've really taken an interest in over the past few months. (I've always wanted to be a skater, you see, but I am deathly afraid of putting my feet on anything that moves by itself.) The K-town skaters 'own' this space, much in the way that young people lay claim to any space. The former artificial green in Silver Spring lovingly called "the Turf" is the best example, but it was clear that Montgomery County was responsible for maintaining the Turf.
In the coming years, Montgomery County will face an increasing demand for these public or semi-public urban spaces that people of all ages can use to hang out, engage in recreational activities, and hold concerts, festivals and parties. This already happens with skaters, who make a hobby out of repurposing the rooms and furniture of the city. With today's budget crisis, it's feasible to imagine a whole network of these informal public-private partnerships on underutilized government properties throughout Montgomery County and the region as a whole.
But where K-town fails is through an unclear delineation of responsibility. The neighborhood and the County gave the space to the skaters to maintain, but didn't install a framework to keep it maintained. Nobody was put in charge. It's a tenant-landlord relationship: a tenant makes a contract with the landlord to take care of the space given to them. In this case, neither the tenant or the landlord was clear. No one was held accountable and there's no one to be held accountable to.
Accountability has also been a major concern in Downtown Silver Spring since the redeveloped area opened a few years ago. As people flood the once-empty streets of our business district, local residents have asked if the patrons are held accountable for their own [bad] behavior. Was the County or developer The Peterson Companies accountable for maintaining the semi-public street Ellsworth Drive? Who should be held accountable for the fights and arrests that erupted after a "Stop the Violence" concert in Downtown two weeks ago?
Providing spaces for people to go is just the start. We also have to make clear who's in charge and what the rules are. There's no reason why a County office building, a skate spot and a neighborhood park can't coexist
- Successful speed cameras require fair speed limits
- Amid scandal, don't lose sight of Gray's policy achievements
- Montgomery plans 160-mile, "gold standard" BRT system
- VDOT ignores own data, pushes widening I-66
- DC's parks are 5th best in the nation, says "Park Score"
- Bethesda gets new but terrible bike racks
- DC's divide need not be black and white
Greater Washington
District of Columbia









