Greater Greater Washington

Posts about Federal Workforce

Government


Why can't the feds telework on extremely hot days?

Federal government workers in the DC area are allowed to telework when it snows. Why aren't they encouraged to do so on extreme heat days? Fortunately, there are signs of progress.


Photo by M.V. Jantzen on Flickr.

During the worst of our record July heat, I asked Federal News Radio's Amy Morris about the federal government's heat wave telework policy. She tweeted that there's no broad policy, only that, "The office manager has discretion depending on office conditions, etc."

Federal News Radio posts this memo on the heat from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to agency heads, which advises managers to keep employees hydrated but says nothing about teleworking.

If federal government workers were allowed to telework in the most extreme heat (say, on days when the heat index is forecast to be over 105), there would be several real benefits:

  • Air quality. Extreme summer heat often goes hand in hand with unhealthy air quality in the DC area and commuter vehicles are a major contributor of pollution. With about 103,000 federal workers telecommuting in 2008 (PDF), that's potentially a large number of tailpipes off the road.

  • Easing transportation strain. On very hot days, the wait for a tow truck for a broken-down car can be a hazard and Metro cars without air conditioning become unbearable hot cars.

  • More productive workers. If you have to start your day drenched in sweat, you're not going to be at your most productiveyou're going to be watching the clock until you can go home and drink a gin & tonic the size of your head. Teleworkers, on the other hand, are scientifically proven to be more productive than their commuting counterparts.

Last week, Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) wrote to OPM asking for a renewed look at encouraging telecommuting on the hottest days:

Last year I wrote to you following the blizzards and nuclear summit to ask if OPM was using telework to mitigate congestion during extreme weather or events which cause widespread street closures. I appreciate your leadership to implement telework during these events.

This summer's weather suggests that extreme heat may also create a need for expanded telework. As you know, we have experienced nearly a month of consecutive days with 90 degree or higher temperatures, including record high temperatures and unusually high nighttime temperatures. This extreme heat is not only uncomfortable, but also exacerbates ground level ozone pollution and associated respiratory diseases.

I am aware that the Department of Homeland Security encouraged employees to take a telework day during the most extreme heat, and would appreciate your consideration of making such a practice more common across agencies. Reducing traffic and associated ozone pollution in our region will become increasingly important as extreme heat becomes more common in our region.

Adapting to DC's oppressive summer heat isn't a new concept. It's why Congress takes an August recess. But at some point our attitude shifted from taking summer siestas to trying to show nature who's boss. Anyone who's gotten a whiff of fellow passengers on Metro lately can tell you how well that's working out.

Of course, our climate is now even hotter than it was in DC's early days, and it's getting worse fast. Globally, June was 1.60°F hotter than the 20th-century average. And considering Congress hasn't curbed America's carbon emissions and the world has copied our inaction, we're hurtling towards the most extreme changes.

Letting feds telework on the hottest of hot days won't protect DC from global warming, but it would be an easy step to making it a bit more tolerable.

Government


Should the federal government snowproof Metro?

Most federal employees are now in their fourth consecutive day without work. It costs $100 million per day in lost productivity to shut down the federal government.


Photo by kenudigit.

There seems to be a correlation between availability of public transit and whether or not federal offices open. Generally, the announcements for closure have been coming shortly after Metro announces that their above ground stations will be closed.

Certainly other factors come into play, such as plowing of parking lots and road condition, but public transit seems to be one of the primary dictating factors.

OPM closed many offices early when the big storm hit Friday, and the entire government has been shut down since. That's six and a half days. Figuring that weekends don't cost quite as much to cancel, this snow storm has probably cost the Federal Government half a billion dollars.

That these closures usually occur only once or twice annually, versus the eight or nine we've had this year. Still, over time, this becomes billions of dollars. How much would it cost the federal government to clear above-ground Metro tracks? How much would it cost to pay for more heating tape for third rails?

In fact, how much extra would it have cost to place some of the above ground stretches of Metro underground? That one perhaps would still have cost too much to have been worth it, but it goes to show what a profound effect our transit investments have had on the productivity of our city, region, and country long term.

DC Maryland Virginia Arlington Alexandria Montgomery Prince George's Fairfax Charles Prince William Loudoun Howard Anne Arundel Frederick Tysons Corner Baltimore Falls Church Fairfax City
CC BY-NC