Greater Greater Washington

Posts about Road Diet

Roads


Purple Line puts University Boulevard on a road diet

As design work continues on the Purple Line, Maryland transit planners say they can convert two traffic lanes on University Boulevard in Langley Park for trains without impacting traffic.


Rendering by the Maryland MTA.

It's "a big plus for the community," said Purple Line project manager Mike Madden at a neighborhood work group meeting last night in Langley Park.

As before, trains will run in the middle of University Boulevard between Piney Branch Road in Silver Spring and Campus Drive in Adelphi, where it will continue through the campus of the University of Maryland and on to the Purple Line's terminus in New Carrollton. But instead of trying to keep the 6 existing traffic lanes while adding the Purple Line, the tracks will now replace 2 of the 6 traffic lanes on this section of University Boulevard.

Engineers from the State Highway Administration say that many segments of University Boulevard carry fewer vehicles today than 20 years ago, while elsewhere traffic levels are about the same. With a few changes, the street can carry as much traffic in 4 lanes as it does with 6 lanes today.

While the street will have to be widened to make room for station platforms, the MTA won't need as much room as they did in their previous plan to keep all 6 lanes and add the Purple Line. With less space needed for car traffic, only 8 businesses will be displaced, compared to 25 before.

Reducing the number of car lanes on University Boulevard will cut speeding, meaning that a street where pedestrians are now frequent collision victims will be transformed into a safer and more welcoming place to walk or bike. There will be room for wider sidewalks and possibly even a cycle track, and there will be bike parking at each of the three Purple Line stations along the corridor, at Piney Branch Road, the future Takoma-Langley Transit Center and Riggs Road.

Meanwhile, key intersections will get traffic lights and turn lanes. This will not only make the street safer to cross, but allow trains to move more smoothly, reducing potential collisions with other vehicles or pedestrians.

These upgrades will help the Purple Line fulfill its economic promise. Both Montgomery and Prince George's counties want to transform the aging strip malls along University Boulevard into an urban corridor akin to downtown Silver Spring. Making University Boulevard a safer and more attractive place to walk will support that goal.

This design change is also good news for Montgomery County's bus rapid transit initiative, which proposes a countywide network of dedicated bus lanes. In dense, close-in areas like Bethesda, Silver Spring and Takoma Park that have the most potential ridership, existing pavement is often the only place new bus lanes can go. However, plans to repurpose traffic lanes for buses have met resistance from residents and county officials alike.

If transportation engineers say we can give car lanes to transit on University Boulevard, it can work elsewhere in the region as well. Hopefully, the Purple Line in Langley Park will serve as an example to the Montgomery County Planning Board and County Council as they consider the BRT plan this year.

Roads


Pedestrian safety fixes coming to Glebe Road in Ballston

Arlington is trying to make Glebe Road safer for pedestrians in Ballston with changes at several key intersections. These will make pedestrians safer, but as Ballston evolves into a more urban place, Glebe may need even more significant changes which VDOT may resist.


Glebe and Carlin Springs Road. Photo by wfyurasko on Flickr.

Glebe Road is a major north/south artery in Arlington County running from the Chain Bridge to US 1 near the border with Alexandria. As Ballston initially evolved into a denser, urban neighborhood, Glebe Road more or less marked the western border of any change. Now, that border is shifting farther west and Glebe Road is itself developing as a node of urban activity.

Many of the car dealerships and gas stations are being replaced by taller and mixed-use development. This includes several new bars and restaurants, which mean that Glebe Road is also seeing more pedestrians along its sidewalks at all hours.

This is great for the neighborhood, but it is tempered by the fact that this section of Glebe also has some Arlington's biggest and busiest car intersections.

In response, Arlington is proposing a number of changes for pedestrian safety at the intersections with Wilson Boulevard, Fairfax Drive, and Carlin Springs Road.

These changes are definitely an improvement to the current conditions, but ultimately Arlington needs to more completely rethink Glebe, from its intersections to how many lanes the road really needs.


Northbound on Glebe Road at Wilson Boulevard. Image from Google.

The picture above is what a driver sees while waiting to proceed north Glebe at Wilson Boulevard. Several cars could fit in the space between the crosswalk and the white line.

The intersection itself is very large and it is difficult for drivers to see what is ahead of them, not to mention those trying to cross on foot before the light changes. Even despite this large distance, a driver trying to left onto Wilson Boulevard does not have to wait for a green arrow if they think the way is clear.


Current (top) and plan (bottom) for Glebe and Wilson. Images from Arlington County and Bing.

The plans move the crosswalks to align with the white stop line. This would reduce the amount of pavement that pedestrians need to cross. The county will also eliminate a slip lane on the southwest corner.

However, the new design still leaves two slip lanes which encourage speeding and create potential conflict points between drivers and pedestrians.


Northbound on Glebe Road at Fairfax Drive. Image from Google.


Plan for Glebe and Fairfax. Image from Arlington County.

At Glebe Road and Fairfax Boulevard, two slip lanes are being removed but one slip lane will remain. This is unfortunate, since pedestrians already face the task of crossing 8 lanes of traffic at this intersection.

Other corners will get rebuilt and become sharper. This will extend the sidewalk and slow down cars negotiating a turn, reducing the amount of roadway that pedestrians need to cross and make pedestrians more visible at the intersection.

Concrete will replace some of the brick sidewalks at the intersection with Wakefield Street, closer to the ramp to I-66, and provide a smoother surface for pedestrians and cyclists connecting to the Custis Trail and the Arlington Loop.

At the intersection at Carlin Springs Drive, Arlington will move a stop light pole to be less intrusive on the sidewalk, replace brick crosswalks with the more traditional zebra-style painted crosswalk, and replace the concrete on the sidewalk itself.

There are no slip lanes at this intersection, but pedestrians face challenges from crossing another 8 lanes of traffic while cars are negotiating unprotected left turns and avoiding traffic that is entering and exiting from the Ballston Mall Garage.

But turning Glebe Road into a safer street cannot just focus on the intersections. Planners must consider if Glebe Road is wider than necessary. The section through Ballston is 6 lanes compared to the usual 4 along the rest of the route.

These extra lanes are less than a mile long, and allow parking in some sections but not others. Passing Ballston Mall, there is not any parking. Drivers speed up into that third lane for about ¼ mile before having to turn onto Wilson or merge back into the travel lane.

This means that in an area with increasing numbers of pedestrians and cyclists, drivers have to make confusing lane changes that can distract them from seeing other road users or encourage them to be reckless.

The intent of these lanes is to serve drivers coming on and off I-66. But Glebe doesn't have similar extra lanes around exits onto US 50 and I-395. It would be better to simplify the road so that drivers can focus their attention on what is going on around them rather than trying to negotiate a confusing right-of-way.

Glebe Road is Virginia State Route 120, meaning the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) controls the road. Thus far, VDOT has been unwilling to consider changes to roads that reduce the amount of space for vehicles, which ties Arlington's hands.

The pedestrian improvements for Glebe Road are welcome, but as more development comes to Ballston, Glebe Road needs to become a street that better balances the needs of all users and keeps them safe.

Roads


How else can DC's camera program improve safety?

The District's traffic camera program is a good idea and a very important initiative, but it won't enjoy public support unless it's clear to voters that safety is the goal, not revenue. A task force, which I'm serving on, will meet soon to formulate recommendations for Councilmembers Cheh and Wells.


Photo by fringehog on Flickr.

Last week, I suggested some ways DC might identify the appropriate fine for speed, red light, and other cameras. In addition to the levels of fines, there are a few other ways we can ensure that the program serves safety first and works well.

We should make sure that drivers get a notice as fast as possible that they've gotten a ticket, so they can adjust behavior before getting one or ten more. Money from cameras could automatically fund more cameras, and projects to redesign the roadway to reduce speeding, red light running and more.

Notify drivers faster

A friend, who works outside the District in a car-dependent area, got 11 camera tickets before finding out about even the first one. If she was driving 11-15 miles over the speed limit, that would come out to $1,375 in fines. What does this achieve?

Since the goal of cameras needs to be getting people to obey speed limits, red lights, and other traffic laws, the quicker DC tells people they've gotten a ticket, the better. Psychologists call this "contiguity," and found that whether one's punishing animals, children or adult humans, the closer a punishment is to the infraction, the more effective the punishment.

We'd actually get the most behavior change if every time someone sped or ran a red light, a sign lit up a bit down the road saying, "You just got a ticket. Please don't speed/run red lights." However, this could anger and possibly distract drivers, and also, current cameras require a human to review each ticket to be sure it's fair. Therefore, this is probably impractical.

However, we can ensure that the tickets come as quickly as possible. A bill around ensuring safety could require that the contractor mail tickets within a set period of time.

The DC DMV also has a system where you can sign up with an email address to get notified about tickets, deadlines for late penalties, and more. Unfortunately, right now you have to get a ticket and then use that ticket number to sign up with the system, "for privacy reasons." At least for DC drivers, the DMV could sign up people for this service when they renew a car registration. Is there anything else that could be done for out-of-state drivers, besides having the DMVs of neighboring states work together?

Let MPD use camera money to buy new cameras

AS we discussed previously, more cameras with lower fines is a more effective way to get people to follow laws than fewer cameras with higher fines. In order to have more cameras with lower fines, however, DC needs to be able to buy more cameras.

The current crop of cameras MPD is ordering were in the pipeline for at least two years, and they're still not in place. That's largely a consequence of the procurement process. Even though the cameras bring in money, all of that money goes to the general fund. If MPD wants another camera or even if an existing one breaks, they need a line item in the annual capital budget specifically authorizing spending that amount of money on cameras.

There are reasons to budget this way. It forces more transparency and ensures that spending follows the priorities of the mayor and council. However, it also makes everything really, really slow.

A bill around cameras could give MPD the power to buy more cameras out of the revenue from other cameras. This would dovetail well with the suggestion from last week that fines automatically lower as more cameras come in. That way, safety improves, but drivers also get the reduction they want, and we maintain the overall balance of severity against certainty.

Use revenue for safety programs

There are other ways to make the streets safer. In particular, often the "design speed" of a road does not match the speed we want people to drive. For a long time, traffic engineers thought that it would be safest if they built every road to handle faster traffic than people actually wanted. The thinking went that if they did this, if a driver sped, they would still be able to avoid hitting a tree or something.

However, this created roads that sent psychological signals to drivers that they should travel faster. Drivers did, and a conventional wisdom evolved that faster driving was appropriate in that area. Standards evolved around setting a speed limit at the 85th percentile of how fast cars are traveling, which meant that the road design, which created a general practice, then became its own law.

To slow down traffic in residential areas, we can set lower speed limits, but most people ignore them. We can then put up cameras, but drivers will continue to feel tension between the signals they get from road design and the posted limits. The best way to solve this is to redesign the road with the right design speed.

There are many ways to reduce design speeds. Bulb-outs at corners reduce the distance pedestrians have to cross and create visual signals to travel slower. Cycle tracks reduce the visual width of a street. Bioswales, medians, and gently curving lanes (chicanes), like those suggested for C Street, NE, can add green features and slow traffic.

The camera law could mandate that camera revenue, over and above the revenue dedicated to the FY2013 budget and which doesn't go to cameras, would go into a special fund that DDOT can use to redesign roadways. Those roadways need to be ones with speeding problems today, where the change reduces the design speed of the road.

What else would you suggest?

Public Spaces


Rather than close Ellsworth Drive, narrow Georgia Avenue

The best and most vibrant public space in downtown Silver Spring is Ellsworth Drive, a street already designed more for pedestrians than for cars. Its success has led to some calls to close it entirely to traffic. But instead, a better approach would be to create other, new public spaces by narrowing Georgia Avenue.


Ellsworth Drive in downtown Silver Spring. Photo by the author.

Even if you don't like the chain stores that line it, it's hard to ignore that Ellsworth Drive has become the place where our community gathers to celebrate, to remember, and even to protest.

So it's not surprising that many people, including Sligo from Silver Spring, Singular, have called for it to be closed to cars altogether, not just on weekends:

"I'm not sure what the original rationale was for keeping this street open on weekdays, but I think that the last seven years have shown us that there's a lot more demand for public space in downtown Silver Spring than there is for a single block of road."
Many of the people I spoke to at last May's charrette talked about the need for public space in Silver Spring. Though pedestrian malls in the United States have often failed, there are quite a few examples of successful ones, like Main Street in Charlottesville, Pearl Street Mall in Boulder and Third Street Promenade in Santa Monica.

Nonetheless, turning Ellsworth Drive into a permanent pedestrian mall may not be the answer, and there are two reasons why.

First off, successful pedestrian malls have pedestrians at all times. Stores need people passing by to get customers, and if there aren't enough people walking by, they'll close. Ellsworth may be crowded on a weekend evening but not the rest of the week. Are the sidewalks busy on a Tuesday morning? Or a Saturday night after 10pm?

Ellsworth Drive does have shops and restaurants and movie theaters, but not enough to keep it busy at all times. Though thousands of new apartments have been built in downtown Silver Spring over the past ten years, there are still very few people living within a quarter-mile of Ellsworth Drive, meaning that the only people on the sidewalks are those who came intentionally.

Adidas, 3rd Street
Third Street Promenade in Santa Monica has a wide variety of stores and other activities taking place at all times.

Main Street in Charlottesville has a number of bars, including the one where Dave Matthews got his start. Like Boulder, Charlottesville also has a major university nearby, drawing tens of thousands of carless college students who have to walk everywhere.

On Third Street, you can buy anything from today's newspaper to a coffeepot to a skateboard. You can also have dinner and a drink afterwards. Above are apartments, offices, hotels and a hostel, and a few blocks away are Santa Monica's famous beaches. Together, all of these amenities create places where the sidewalks are busy at all times, which justifies closing a street to cars.

Second, we shouldn't be asking why the sidewalks on Ellsworth are so crowded, but rather why sidewalks everywhere else in Silver Spring are so empty. Ellsworth Drive currently works well for cars and pedestrians. But most others in the downtown area, from big ones like Georgia Avenue and Colesville Road to little ones like Thayer Avenue or Fenton Street, have been designed to move cars, resulting in some pretty uninviting places to walk.

The biggest reason why businesses along Georgia Avenue or Colesville Road may continue to struggle despite the ongoing revitalization is probably because nobody wants to walk there. Tight sidewalks and speeding cars are enough to encourage walkers to find safe places, like Ellsworth Drive, and stay put as long as they can.

Georgia Avenue is as wide as the Beltway!
The space given over to cars on Georgia Avenue is as wide as the through lanes on the Beltway.

How can we create more public space in downtown Silver Spring? Make the streets narrower. At its intersection with Silver Spring Avenue, Georgia Avenue is nearly 110 feet wide from curb to curb. That's as wide as the through lanes on the Beltway.

Let's say you made the lanes on Georgia 10 feet wide, narrow enough to get cars going 30 miles an hour. Keeping the current setup, with six lanes for through traffic and two for parking, you could make the road 80 feet wide, freeing up thirty feet of pavement for other uses, like wider sidewalks, a landscaped median, or space for cafe tables.

You could do this exercise with any street in the business district, giving space back to the pedestrian without changing traffic patterns. But if we were really ambitious, we would change traffic patterns, giving over street space to bikes or transit vehicles, such as the DC streetcar, which may one day continue up Georgia Avenue to Silver Spring. These changes could allow our streets to move more people than a lane of cars ever could while making them much nicer spaces to be in.

Georgia Avenue Just Before Sunset
Georgia Avenue's a nice place to drive through, but a pretty miserable place to walk.

The Good Life (Darrel Rippeteau)
What Georgia Avenue could be like. Drawing by architect Darrel Rippeteau.

The argument for making Ellsworth Drive a pedestrian mall is pretty similar to the one for building a bridge across Wayne Avenue to the new Silver Spring Library: drivers speed through downtown Silver Spring, so let's keep pedestrians far away where they can be safe. But doesn't this condone speeding?

We should make all of Silver Spring safe and fun for walking, even if it means drivers have to slow down. In doing so, we'll help local businesses, improve traffic, and return public space to the people.

Roads


Eastern Market plaza road diet: Study and experiment, don't presume

The moment the Capitol Hill Town Square team finished their presentation, one woman stood up ramrod straight, her hand in the air, an intense, determined expression on her face. The moderator called on her, and her statement was as sharp as her facial expression. This whole notion of traffic calming on Pennsylvania Avenue at Eastern Market Metro was just the wrong thing for Capitol Hill, based on faulty assumptions, she argued. We don't need traffic to move slower, or put any impediment along this commuter artery from Maryland.


Triptych alternative landscape diagram. Image from Esocoff & Associates.

A number of other residents echoed this sentiment, whether in questions, rudely shouted comments from the back, mutterings not entirely under their breaths from a couple next to me, or applause that broke out after questioners asked hostile questions to the project teammirrored by approximately equally loud applause when other questioners challenged the car-centric assumptions of some other questions.

Many residents of Capitol Hill seem to have made up their minds one way or the other about this project from the moment they heard about it. In fact, EMMCA declared themselves unalterably opposed to a plan long before the team created a plan. That's too bad, not because we must realign Pennsylvania Avenue around Eastern Market, but because we should decide what to do based on evidence, not dogma, and the evidence isn't all yet available.

Most people instinctively believe that traffic is like a river. There's a bunch of water flowing down from a mountain, and running along a stream. Narrow the stream bed, and the water will run into some other river, or flood your house. If you dam it up, the water backs up to create a lake, and nobody wants a traffic lake. However, traffic isn't like water. It's more like air, which can expand and contract to fill the available space.

It was clear from the questions that many Capitol Hill residents were basing their opinion on the water mental model. If we shrink Pennsylvania from three through lanes to two, where will the cars go? Will they divert through neighborhood streets? Will traffic back up on Pennsylvania? Will slower-moving traffic create more pollution? What about emergency evacuation?

There's no particular reason to believe such a change would bring these effects at all. Some drivers may begin taking the Southeast Freeway instead. Some would switch to transit; Metro remains underutilized on the eastern ends of the Orange and Blue Lines. Some would bicycle, given the bike lane the team has suggested adding on Pennsylvania Avenue.

Or, perhaps, the change would make traffic worse or would divert substantial traffic to neighborhood streets. The transportation consultants from Gorove/Slade don't believe so, and have promised to release their findings. Side streets aren't designed for speed and even a slower Pennsylvania Avenue would be better than slogging through the stop signs. But we can judge for ourselves once we have all the facts. Driving along Pennsylvania from time to time doesn't constitute having all the facts.

Residents near Sherman Avenue in Columbia Heights would love to calm traffic through their neighborhood. Commenter angryparakeet wrote, "I'd like to reclaim [this] neighborhood from MD commuters." It's surprising and sad that some residents of Capitol Hill see efforts to make their neighborhood a more pleasant place as the wrong direction, closing their minds to other possibilities.

Fortunately, we can without spending millions to redo the plaza. Let's install the traffic modifications right now. The "Existing Improved" alternative suggests closing the short segments of D Street connecting to Pennsylvania, putting bulb-outs at many of the corners, and narrowing Pennsylvania by about half a lane, turning the third travel lane into a bike lane. We could implement these changes now with some plastic curbs, posts, and a little paint.


Excerpt from the traffic plan for the "Existing Improved" option. Image from Esocoff & Associates Architects. Click for full, larger version.

Let's try it out for six months or a year. If the change substantially worsens residents' quality of life, we can reverse it and redesign all three options to retain three travel lanes. If it improves the situation, then we can debate a straight road, an oval, or a rectangle free of the debate over traffic calming.

Transit


Breakfast Links: Narrowing, tunnelling, and bulldozing streets


Georgetown Metropolitian's rendering of a possible Georgetown Metro station, adjacent to the PNC bank branch

Suburbs going multi-modal: Fresh off the heels of Virginia's cul-de-sac ban, VDOT plans to convert two lanes of Reston's Lawyers Road into two bike lanes, plus a center turn lane. The Reston Association has also recommended reducing the speed limit from 45 to 35 miles per hour. For context, as recently as 1967, Lawyers Road was a one-lane dirt path. (Restonian, Joshua D)

Piercing Georgetown's street veil: The Georgetown Metropolitian has brainstormed various places where a hypothetical split Metro Blue Line might provide street access in Georgetown without tearing down an historic building, including in the PNC parking lot, adjacent to the Canal, or directly on Wisconsin Avenue. The quick study doesn't consider an all-elevator option akin to Forest Glen or Brooklyn's Clark Street station. (JTS)

Legal action expected: Once more, "Tysons Tunnel," a group opposing the under-construction elevated Metro Silver Line through Tysons, is threatening legal action. Backed by the Sierra Club and another unnamed "watchdog" group, Tysons Tunnel is planning to sue based on provisions of Virginia's Public-Private Transportation Act, as a way to have the plans reevaluated and redrawn with a tunnel. (WBJ, JTS)

Then, fleas. Now, Caterpillars. The WMATA-owned property at Florida Avenue and 8th Street NW which presently hosts a weekend flea market, is about to be under contract. Bannecker Ventures expects to close within 60 days on the land, begin construction in summer 2011, and offer move-ins in Fall 2011, for a 120-unit apartment building with 20,000 sf of ground-level retail. This is the same property for which WMATA solicited proposals last summer, unsuccessfully. (Geoff H)

Bulldozing cities: My cousin, in town for the weekend, asked if there would ever be a way to end the traffic on DC's radial freeways. I responded, "not likely, as such relief would require bulldozing the outer suburbs" (as the existing transportation demand will otherwise continue to be there forever, and any widening will induce more exurban road construction), but this act is taking place right now in a number of American cities, including Detroit and Flint, Michigan. Hopefully the governments will limit the destruction to the outer, less sustainable, neighborhoods while preserving the core areas. (Telegraph, Steve, MarkM)

And ... Virginia Rep. Cantor continues to propose eliminating pedestrian and bicycle enhancements (VBF, Jaime) ... The Prince of Petworth asks his readers to comment on whether public housing has failed in DC (Eric H) ... In a case study of "new" urbanism, the Oregonian studies how the architecture of modern buildings in Portland near streetcar routes mimics the city's historic streetcar-adjacent architecture.

Have a tip for the links? Submit it here.
DC Maryland Virginia Arlington Alexandria Montgomery Prince George's Fairfax Charles Prince William Loudoun Howard Anne Arundel Frederick Tysons Corner Baltimore Falls Church Fairfax City
CC BY-NC