Posts about Trains
Transit
MARC listens, improves draft Brunswick Line schedule
MARC proposed a disastrous schedule for its Brunswick Line in December. Fortunately, they've created a new schedule proposal that is a huge improvement over the first one. It adds service to Montgomery County stations, which now account for half of all Brunswick Line riders.
Still, the proposal will not make everybody happy. People who now take the westbound super-express would have longer trips. Many riders would have longer gaps between evening rush-hour trains, due to earlier start and end times for westbound West Virginia service. And late riders from West Virginia would have to transfer to a bus to get home.
Nonetheless, MARC and MTA deserve real praise for their willingness to listen to riders and elected representatives, and to use this information to revise their approach.
Service improvements in the proposal
MARC's proposal increases service to Montgomery County, which not only contributes an increasing share of current riders but will account for still more in the future through transit-oriented developments around MARC stations.
At least one more train would stop at each of the county's stations except Silver Spring and Rockville, where all trains already stop, and Metropolitan Grove. The additional service would also benefit riders who work in Germantown, Gaithersburg, and Kensington. This is a good and needed change, and MARC should make sure it stays in the final schedule.
Also, the proposal adds a PanTran bus connection to West Virginia for the first daily westbound train. This would increase flexibility for riders from West Virginia stations who might need to go home early.
Finally, the proposal adds a third morning train from West Virginia. The train would leave Martinsburg at 6:00 am, between the two current departures.
West Virginia westbound service changes
In this schedule proposal, westbound train service to West Virginia would begin and end earlier. Instead of the 3 West Virginia-bound trains that currently leave Union Station at 4:55 pm, 5:40 pm, and 7:15 pm, there would be 3 trains leaving at 4:15 pm, 5:15 pm, and 6:15 pm. The last westbound Brunswick Line train (the current 7:15 pm departure) would end in Brunswick instead of Martinsburg, and West Virginia riders would transfer to a PanTran bus.
MARC says that West Virginia riders have asked for an earlier departure, so the proposed 4:15 pm train might be an improvement. However, a bus transfer would not be a welcome change for riders who now take the last train.
In addition, riders who are not from West Virginia would have longer gaps between evening rush-hour trains because of the shift to earlier West Virginia service. This is because the 4:55 pm West Virginia train would become a 4:45 pm Brunswick train; the 5:15 pm departure would go to West Virginia instead of Frederick; the 5:40 pm departure for Brunswick would become a 5:35 pm departure for Frederick; and the 6:00 pm Brunswick-bound train would become the last West Virginia train, leaving at 6:15 pm.
For Frederick branch riders, the 85-minute gap between the trains leaving Union Station at 3:50 pm and 5:15 pm would increase to a 110-minute gap between trains leaving at 3:45 pm and 5:35 pm.
For Brunswick and Point of Rocks riders, there would be 2 evening rush trains (leaving at 5:15 pm and 6:15 pm) instead of 3 (leaving at 4:55 pm, 5:40 pm, and 6:00 pm).
And for Montgomery County riders, the 20-minute gap between trains leaving at 5:40 pm and 6:00 pm trains would increase to a 40-minute gap between trains leaving at 5:35 pm and 6:15 pm.
The magnitude of these confusing changes, the extra effort of arranging interstate connecting-bus service to the West Virginia stations, and the fact that the previous schedule proposal also had the last westbound train ending in Brunswick, all combine to suggest that ending the last train in Brunswick instead of Martinsburg is very important to MARC. Why?
Does MARC want to reduce service to the West Virginia stations because West Virginia does not contribute to MARC funding? If so, why do both proposed schedules add a third eastbound train from West Virginia?
Or does CSX want MARC trains off their tracks earlier? The last train now deadheads back to Brunswick after its 9:14 pm stop in Martinsburg. Storing the train in Martinsburg would get it off earlier. But ending the train in Brunswick at 8:58 pm, as MARC now proposes, would get it off earlier still.
Other issues
There are 3 other big issues: the end of the super-express, the absence of new trains, and the non-restoral of daily service for the first westbound train.
First, the proposed schedule would end westbound-service on the historic
super-express, which now leaves Union Station at 4:55 pm and stops only in Silver Spring, Rockville, Point of Rocks, Brunswick, and the 3 West Virginia stations. MARC explains that "with growing ridership in Montgomery County, we can no longer skip these stops when the demand exists."
Second, the proposed schedule does not add to the Brunswick Line's current 18 daily trains. MARC explains that CSX will not allow MARC to add trains until the State of Maryland builds a third track. However, MARC has nonetheless asked CSX for permission to add 1 morning and 1 evening train. CSX might even agree, given federal and state funding of CSX's National Gateway Project.
Third, the proposed schedule does not restore daily service for the first westbound train. This Brunswick-bound train currently leaves Union Station at 1:45 pm on Fridays only. Daily service ended in 2009 when the Maryland Transit Administration cut service due to budget shortfalls.
What now?
MARC has stated that "[t]here is no target date for implementation As they did the last time, MARC has set up an on-line survey for people to comment on the proposal.
MARC will also hold "town hall" meetings in Charles Town on Saturday, May 19; Rockville on Tuesday, May 22; and Frederick on Wednesday, May 23.
In addition, MARC staff will be at Brunswick Line stations to gather feedback in the afternoons/evenings between May 1 and May 17. MTA will send out e-mail alerts with specific stations, dates, and times.
Transit
New data show ridership patterns on the Brunswick Line
MARC is proposing changes to the schedule on its Brunswick Line which significantly improves service to Montgomery County stations. The changes reflect new, recently-released boarding statistics for the line's 19 stations, statistics which can help them better serve commuters.
The data show, among other things, that Montgomery County stations account for roughly half of the line's eastbound riders; Germantown is one of MARC's big stations; riders go to destinations other than Rockville, Silver Spring, and Union Station; and Frederick branch ridership is not meeting projections, probably due to its infrequent service.
In addition, the Brunswick Line is a significant part of MARC's service; Brunswick and Point of Rocks ridership is big but smaller than Montgomery County's; and West Virginia has hundreds of people who ride the train despite infrequent service, long travel times, and ticket surcharges due to lack of state funding.
The Brunswick Line is arguably the most complicated of MARC's 3 lines. It's certainly the longest, running for 73 miles northwest through Montgomery and Frederick Counties and on to Martinsburg, West Virginia, with a 13.5-mile branch line to Frederick.
In addition, like MARC's Camden Line, it runs on tracks owned and controlled by freight carrier CSX. And it is constrained, despite growing ridership, because CSX refuses to allow MARC to add trains until the State of Maryland funds and builds a third track.
On weekday mornings, Brunswick Line trains bring people from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia to jobs in Montgomery County, the District, and Alexandria and Arlington. On weekday afternoons and evenings, Brunswick Line trains take them home.
Meanwhile, there are big plans for the future along the line. Montgomery County is encouraging transit-oriented development on its part of the Brunswick Line. Frederick County is doing the same in and near Frederick. Even West Virginia is getting in on the act.
But good policy requires good data. So, where do the ridership data come from, and what do they show?
MARC's counting method
The data come from counts conducted on Wednesday, February 8, and Wednesday, March 14. MTA passed out the data at the monthly MARC Riders Advisory Council meeting on April 19.
On count days, conductors are supposed to count everybody who gets on and off their train at each station. The total number of people getting on and off each train is supposed to be equal.
The boarding numbers are misleadingly precise. That is, a count of 123 eastbound boardings on Frederick on March 14 does not mean that exactly 123 people got on. However, the numbers are still useful, as they are probably generally accurate, and anyway, they are the only numbers available.
The Brunswick Line overall
The Brunswick Line accounted for roughly 1/5 of total MARC boardings, while the Penn Line accounted for roughly 2/3, and the Camden Line accounted for the rest. Here is a comparison of Brunswick Line boardings to MARC's other two lines:
| MARC Line | Direction/Total | February 8 | March 14 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brunswick Line | Eastbound (am) | 3,898 | 4,102 |
| Brunswick Line | Westbound (pm) | 3,562 | 3,844 |
| Brunswick Line | Total | 7,460 | 7,946 |
| Camden Line | Total | 4,965 | 4,711 |
| Penn Line | Total | 22,911 | 26,218
|
On both days, there were more eastbound than westbound boardings on the Brunswick Line. This may be a precision error, or there may actually have been 300-some people each day who went to work on MARC and home a different way.
Montgomery County
Montgomery County has 11 stations: Silver Spring, Kensington, Garrett Park, Rockville, Washington Grove, Gaithersburg, Metropolitan Grove, Germantown, Boyds, Barnesville, and Dickerson. Rockville and Silver Spring are major destination stations as well as origin stations.
9 daily trains in each direction currently make stops in Montgomery County. 2 eastbound and 4 westbound daily trains currently stop at all of the county stations.
Here are the boardings for Montgomery County:
| Direction/Total | Station/Total | February 8 | March 14 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eastbound | Total | 1,844 | 2,082 |
| Germantown | 780 | 837 | |
| Westbound | Total | 1,170 | 1,071 |
| Silver Spring | 605 | 654 | |
| Rockville | 419 | 312 | |
| Other* | 146 | 105 | |
| Total | 3,014 | 3,153 |
The data show three notable facts:
- Germantown is a big station, by MARC standards. It's the biggest station in Montgomery County and on the Brunswick Line overall, and it's bigger, in terms of one-way boardings, than all Camden Line stations and all but 4 Penn Line stations (Odenton, Halethorpe, BWI, and Penn Station). (This comparison excludes Union Station.)
- Rockville and Silver Spring are not the only destination stations in the county. People also ride MARC to jobs in Germantown, Metropolitan Grove, Gaithersburg, Garrett Park, and Kensington.
- On the March 14 count day, there were more eastbound boardings at Montgomery County stations than at all other stations on the Brunswick Line combined.
The Frederick branch
The Frederick branch has 2 stations: Monocacy and Frederick. The trains run on a 13.5-mile line that branches off just east of (and not connecting to) the Point of Rocks station. The State of Maryland built and owns most of the track. Currently, 3 eastbound trains leave from Frederick between 5:12 and 7:10 am, and 3 trains bound west for Frederick leave Union Station between 3:50 and 6:30 pm.
Here are the boarding numbers (all eastbound) on the Frederick Line:
| Station | February 8 | March 14 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 442 | 408 |
| Frederick | 150 | 123 |
| Monocacy | 292 | 285
|
The Frederick branch opened in 2001 with 3 eastbound and 3 westbound trains. Projected ridership was 1,600 by 2005, with double the number of trains. Obviously, Frederick ridership is still much less; on the other hand, the number of trains is still the same as in 2001. That more frequent trains would increase ridership is a reasonable assumption.
Brunswick and Point of Rocks
There are also 2 stations in Frederick County that are not on the Frederick branch: Point of Rocks and Brunswick. Currently, 6 eastbound trains leave Brunswick between 5:00 and 7:40 am, and 6 daily westbound trains stopping at Brunswick and Point of Rocks leave Union Station between 3:35 and 7:15 pm.
Here are the boarding numbers at Point of Rocks and Brunswick:
| Direction/Total | Station/Total | February 8 | March 14 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eastbound | Total | 1,135 | 1,162 |
| Brunswick | 687 | 677 | |
| Point of Rocks | 448 | 485 | |
| Westbound | Total | 29 | 17 |
| Brunswick | 28 | 15 | |
| Point of Rocks | 1 | 2 | |
| Total | 1,164 | 1,179
|
Brunswick is the second-biggest origin station on the Brunswick Line, and Point of Rocks is roughly tied for third with Gaithersburg.
The eastbound boarders include residents of Virginia and West Virginia as well as Maryland. However, there do not seem to be any data on how many.
Some of the westbound boardings may represent West Virginia residents who work in Kensington, Gaithersburg, Metropolitan Grove, or Germantown, and transfer from a Brunswick-bound train to the West Virginia super-express that leaves Union Station at 4:55 pm. In Montgomery County, the super-express stops only in Silver Spring and Rockville.
West Virginia
West Virginia has 3 stations: Harpers Ferry, Duffields, and Martinsburg. Currently, 2 eastbound trains leave Martinsburg at 5:25 and 6:30 am, and 3 trains bound west for Martinsburg leave Union Station between 4:55 and 7:15 pm.
Here are the boarding numbers (all eastbound) at the West Virginia stations:
| Station | February 8 | March 14 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 477 | 450 |
| Martinsburg | 199 | 183 |
| Duffields | 173 | 175 |
| Harpers Ferry | 105 | 92
|
West Virginia no longer contributes to MARC funding. Eastern Panhandle legislators are trying to do something about this. Meanwhile, since 2009, West Virginia riders have paid a surcharge of $2 per one-way ticket, $20 per weekly ticket, and $80 per monthly ticket.
Transit
Google Street View introduces rail to the mix
Google's Street View technology has recently been expanding to cover trails with the introduction of their "trike". Now, it's come to the rails, too.
The new imagery hasn't been put in Google maps yet, but when it does, you'll be able to catch a glimpse of what it's like to ride a train through the Swiss Alps, from the driver's seat.
Rhaetian Railway partnered with Google to make this happen. The imagery was captured by mounting the Streetview trike on a flatcar. The railway company hopes it will attract riders. And Google has helped to document a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
Transit
Ask GGW: Where are "SPECIAL" Metrorail trains going?
It's the weekend, and there's track work taking place on the Metrorail system. Trains are running on reduced headways, and after an extended wait, a train finally rolls in

"SPECIAL" trains show up most often when there's track work going on somewhere on the line, but, the fact is, they can appear at any time. To understand how the problematic signs come to be, it's important to first understand how the side destination signs on Metrorail trains are set.
The train operator doesn't actually set the destination station, even though this is what riders see from the platform. Rather, he or she sets a destination code, which indicates the train's destination station and the route it will take. Destination codes are two digits long, so there are only 99 destination codes available. This means that not all possible combinations of stations and routes can be displayed; there are some stations where trains can terminate that don't have a destination code assigned.
One of these stations is East Falls Church, where all westbound Orange Line trains from downtown terminated this past weekend due to the Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project. Thus, Orange Line trains bound for East Falls Church display "SPECIAL" all the way from New Carrollton to East Falls Church. This work has been going on throughout 2011, and will continue in 2012, based on Metro's track work schedule.
Because the PIDS (the in-station "next train" display boards) are also driven by trains' destination codes, more often than not they only display "Train".
Regardless of the destination code set, the train operator can manually override a train's side destination signs, forcing them to "SPECIAL" or "NO PASSENGERS" with the use of a switch in the cab. In certain circumstances (especially when there's no track work going on), it may be the case that the train operator has the right destination code entered but has failed to set the train identity control switch appropriately. In those cases, a kind word on the intercom or through the cab window will often get the problem resolved.
The situation is an accessibility and wayfinding nightmare. While operators of "SPECIAL" trains are supposed to make frequent public address announcements with regard to the train's route, they're often inaudible to the majority of passengers, and at their best, they still do nothing for hearing-impaired riders.
Where a station without a destination code is a frequent terminal due to work (like East Falls Church), the best solution would be for WMATA to revise the destination code table plugged into each railcar's display system. Unfortunately, that requires bringing every railcar into the shop, an expensive and time-consuming proposition.
In the meantime, riders may find it helpful to know that if, for example, there's track work on the Orange Line, but not the Blue Line, then westbound trains at downtown stations that display "SPECIAL" are almost certainly operating on the Orange Line and terminating at East Falls Church.
Even if Metro can reduce the use of "SPECIAL" destination signs for frequent work, these trains will always exist. Not every station can have a destination code; there simply aren't enough codes.
Sometimes trains will need to terminate at a certain station due to work very infrequently, and for them it's probably not worth it to reset the codes for a one-time event. That was the case this past weekend, when Green Line trains from Greenbelt terminated at Georgia Avenue. Their destination signs displayed "SPECIAL" while going southbound, but the switch replacement work on the Green Line at U Street was a one-weekend event.
In any circumstance, since they're going to continue to exist, Metro should make more of an effort to communicate the route and destination of "SPECIAL" trains to customers.
Transit
Afternoon links: Don't fall into the tunnel
Transit
Afternoon links: "War on Drivers" armistice unlikely
Transit
Sci-fi coast to coast high speed rail network
Imagine that long-distance, very high speed rail lines (airplane speeds or better) were practical and relatively cheap to build. What might the resulting transit-like intercity service look like?
Working on the recent DC fantasy maps reminded me of this map which I created years ago. Here it is, dusted off for your pleasure. Click on the map for a larger version.
More notes and comments below.
I envisioned three types of service: international, express, and regional. Regional service would stop at all of the stops, while express would hit only the express stops (the circles). There may also be local service stopping at even more locations along the routes.
International service would cross national boundaries, stopping in the express stations along the route in special customs-controlled areas. The national express and regional services would turn back at a border instead; for example, the green express and regional services would run from San Antonio to the US-controlled portion of the Detroit/Windsor station complex (located somewhere near the border) and with a connection to the Canadian service that continues north; meanwhile, the green international service would run from South and Central America and Mexico to Europe with stops at the express stations in the U.S. and Canada.
Looking at this map now, I can definitely see lots of smaller cities that I left off. It's not meant to be exhaustive; this map only shows the major regional and national routes. There would probably be additional local stops and smaller regional lines.
Some lines would run extra service on part of the line; I could see extra frequencies in the Ohio portion of the maroon line or the Colorado portion of the lime line. Thin lines aren't necessarily less important, just shorter and/or not lines that connect several major cities.
In the major cities, this map shows one primary station. This would be a transfer point (perhaps located at the site of the now-unused airport?) from the intercity lines to a network of local lines that connect the transfer station to various parts of the metro area, and from one part of the metro area to another. The local lines may also reach the adjacent stations; for example, Washington DC's local lines would reach at least as far as Baltimore (as they do today) and Richmond.
Transit
Greater Baltimore & Washington Transit Future version 2
This map shows what the transportation system of the Baltimore-
Thanks for the many comments left on version 1 of the Greater Washington Transit Future fantasy map. I've added in almost all of the lines suggested in those comments (Columbia Pike streetcar, Potomac Yards transitway, light rail to Waldorf, etc.) I've incorporated the Baltimore expansion proposal (map and report), everything suggested by MWCOG (see page 3), rail expansion on those lines that still exist (some have been reused for Baltimore Metro or as rail trails), and the MARC growth plan (trying my best to figure out where the stations would be And without further adieu, I present version 2.0 of the Greater Baltimore & Washington Transit Future map (click for very very big version:
For more details and notes, please see the notes for version 1.
Update 4/23/08: I had made a couple of small tweaks as a start on a version 3 of this map, but never finished it; I've now updated this map to include those changes. Most notable is an extra branch of the Corridor Cities Transitway, the more direct route ACT is pushing for, and a light rail up Columbia Pike from Silver Spring to Columbia Town Center along the route suggested by Dan of Just Up the Pike. The older version is here.
Transit
Greater Washington Transit Future: a multimodal fantasy map
Update: Version 2 is now available.
Dan at BeyondDC was one of several people to comment that Metrorail is not the most cost-effective way to provide transit. In fact, it's pretty darn cost-ineffective. So while it's fun to dream about Metro lines everywhere, what's a more achievable transit vision?
There are two areas officials want to improve transit, on opposite ends of the regional-local spectrum. On the one side, Maryland wants to evolve MARC from an occasional and slow commuter railroad into "a mass transit service more like Metro". This would involve beefing up frequencies, expanding the system, and through-routing trains past Union Station to L'Enfant Plaza, Crystal City, and Alexandria, and potentially on to the VRE lines on the other end. Transfers should be publicized on the map and announced by Metro announcers, riders should be able to use SmartTrip, and the system should be branded (something like the "Maryland-Virginia Express").
On the other end, DC wants to connect more neighborhoods with streetcars, and is starting work in a few places. DC started out with an ambitious streetcar plan (here's a map and a presentation from DDOT. This was scaled back in the comprehensive plan (item #7), but what if DC built all the streetcars they've proposed?
We'd get a map something like this. Click for big version and see below or click "read more" for detailed notes.
What's in this map
Light rail, streetcar, BRT, and/or monorail lines. This includes the existing Baltimore Light Rail, the proposed Purple Line from Bethesda to New Carrollton, the proposed Corridor Cities Transitway north of Shady Grove (or one version of it, anyway), all the DC Streetcars, and monorail or something to Fort Belvoir.
The Maryland-Virginia Express (my name). All MARC and VRE lines have increased service equivalent to that of Metro, riders can easily transfer and use SmarTrip, and all trains run through from Union Station to Alexandria.
Infill stations in Alexandria and at the Jefferson. As discussed in the first fantasy map.
What's not in this map
The Silver Line. I just couldn't fit this in since the track from Foggy Bottom to Stadium-Armory would have gotten very thick with lines.
An extended Green Line. Most of the areas on the proposed extended Green Line are already served by MARC, making it unnecessary if MARC becomes the MVX.
MARC/VRE rail expansion. MARC wants to extend its lines and Dan of BeyondDC suggests making a complete regional system. There wasn't space on the map to fit it all in.
Baltimore Light Rail expansion. Baltimore is studying expanding its light rail; I just didn't have time to put everything in.
Columbia. It'd be nice to have transit in Columbia. But what? There could be a light rail loop connecting to the Jessup station. Or, there is a track that branches off south of Jessup that dead ends in a former industrial area in southeast Columbia; that could be extended in a tunnel under Broken Land Parkway to Columbia Town Center, and MVX could have a branch running there with a stop near the current rail terminus for a park-and-ride. Or maybe a combination.
I'm going to take a little break from maps because other, immediate policy issues are being neglected with all this transit expansion fantasizing. However, please give your comments and I will make tweaks and/or more maps soon!
- Successful speed cameras require fair speed limits
- Amid scandal, don't lose sight of Gray's policy achievements
- Bethesda gets new but terrible bike racks
- Montgomery plans 160-mile, "gold standard" BRT system
- DC's parks are 5th best in the nation, says "Park Score"
- How many railcars does it take to run Metro?
- Live chat with Matt Yglesias
Greater Washington
District of Columbia









